摘要
物权的保护方法与债权的保护方法均自成体系,但二者之间又存在诸多联系,有时甚至不易区分。在一定条件下,物权的保护方法与债权的保护方法会发生相互转化和竞合。对物权与债权的民法保护方法进行比较,在实践中有利于对物权和债权的充分保护,在理论上可为立法提供参考。笔者重点论证了物权的保护方法与债权的保护方法的异同、转化和竞合问题。
The protective methods of real right and those of obligatory right each goes their own way,but there are a lot of connections between them .Sometimes it is hard to make a distinction .On certain conditions,the protective methods of real right and those of obligatory right can transform mutually and coincide .It is of great significance to compare the protective methods of real right and those of obligatory right in civil law.For one thing,it may help protect the real right and the obligatory right sufficiently in reality;for another,it can provide a legislation program in terms of theory. The article pays much attention to the similarity,distinction,transformation and coincidence between the protective methods of real right and those of obligatory right.
出处
《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第4期37-43,共7页
Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
关键词
物权
债权
保护方法
民法通则
real right
obligatory right
protective method
General Rule of the Civil Law