摘要
各集装箱办理站产生的集装箱流向其邻近的结点站输送,可能产生的运输方案有三个。方案一:用普通集装箱列车挂运直接进入结点站作业;方案二:用一般摘挂列车输送,在编组站改编后用小运转列车向结点站输送;方案三:用一般摘挂列车输送直接进入结点站改编。分析不同运输方案的作业过程,将运输过程产生的箱小时、车小时消耗按作业性质分解并分别计算。比较不同方案的总的箱小时、车小时消耗可知,方案一为消耗最少的运输方案。同时分析各运输方案实施可行性,方案一对区间能力占用较大,方案二较为有利。由此得出结论:方案一可作为集装箱运输发展的方向,方案二是目前状况下较为有利的运输方案。
Stations that handle container traffic send the container flow generated thereof to the adjacent node stations. There are three possible ways of doing so: Solution 1-general container trains are used to send the containers directly to the node stations; solution 2-pick-up trains are used to send the containers to a marshaling yard and then the containers are sent to the node station by short-distance trains; solution 3-pick-up trains are used to send the containers directly to the node station to be reformed. The different operation procedures are analyzed. The consumption of container-hours and vehicle-hours of each solution are decomposed and calculated according to their respective operation nature. Solution 1 proves to be the best choice, consuming the least. The feasibility of each solution is also studied. Solution 1 uses the most of the line capacity, and solution 2 is better. Hereby the paper concludes that solution 1 is the targeted mode while solution 2 the most favorable under the present situation.
出处
《中国铁道科学》
EI
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2003年第6期124-128,共5页
China Railway Science
基金
铁道部科技研究开发计划项目(2002X019 B)
关键词
集装箱运输
结点站
列车开行方式
运输方案
Container transportation
Container node station
Modes of train operation
Transportation solution