摘要
长期以来 ,理论界多数人以为《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》第 79条是情事变更原则的国际贸易法渊源 ,其谬误之处在于片面理解了不可抗力是情事变更的绝对情事 ,混淆了不可抗力是情事变更的可能事由与不可抗力必然导致情事变更之间的界限。《公约》第 79条的性质理应属于不可抗力违约免责制度 ,并不是情事变更原则的依据。 196 9年《维也纳条约法公约》第 6 2条以及《国际商事合同通则》第 6 .2 .1——— 6 .2 .3条分别是情事变更原则在公法和私法领域内的国际法渊源。
So far, Majority people think that the seventy ninth article of the United Nations Convention on Contracts of the International Sale of Goods is the origin of Clausula Rebus sic Stantibus in international trade law.The falsehood of this view is incomprehensively comprehending that Force Majeure is absolute state of affairs Clausula Rebus sic Stantibus,mixing the ambit between that force majeure is the possible reason of Clausula Rebus sic Stantibus and that force majeure cannot but result in Clausula Rebus sic Stantibus.The nature of the seventy ninth article of the United Nations Convention on Contracts of the International Sale of Goods not belongs to Clausula Rebus sic Stantibus but force majeure.The Vienna Convention on Treaty Law in 1969 is the origin of Clausula Rebus sic Stantibus in international public law.The article 6.2.1--6.2.3 in The Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts is the origin of Clausula Rebus sic Stantibus in international private law.
出处
《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2003年第5期22-25,共4页
Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)