摘要
帛书易传《要》篇所谓“六府”,当为“主藏六物之税”之“六府”,所谓“五正”,当为“五官之长”。将“六府”解释为《淮南子·天文训》中所言“子午、丑未、寅申、卯酉、辰戌、巳亥”“六府”,“五正”解释成《鶡冠子》中的“神化”、“官治”、“教治”、“因治”、“事治”“五正”,皆与《要》篇之义不合,因而由这种解释推出的卦气说早在先秦已有的结论是难以成立的。
The six tax supervisors in Yao of Yizhuan copied on silk should be the six supervisors that administered the finances and tax revenue of six departments in government. The Five Senior Officials should be the commanding officials that administered the five functional departments in government.The explanation of Liufu as Ziwu, Chouwei, Yinshen, Maoyou, Chenxu,Sihai in The Writings of Prince Huainan -The Astronomical Instructions, and the explanation of Wuzheng as Shenhua, Guanzhi, Jiaozhi, Yinzhi, Shizhi in the Xieguanzi don't conform to those in Yao. So the pre-Qin conclusion of the Divinatory Symbols Theory resulting from this explanation can hardly hold water.
出处
《古籍整理研究学刊》
2003年第3期34-37,15,共5页
Journal of Ancient Books Collation and Studies
关键词
帛书易传
六府
五正
卦气
Yizhuan copied on silk
Liufu
Wuzheng
Divinatory symbols