期刊文献+

口服吗啡缓释片与静脉自控镇痛对晚期癌性疼痛的临床疗效比较 被引量:2

A comparative study of po controlled-release morphine tablets and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in late stage cancer pain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :综合比较吗啡缓释片和病人自控静脉镇痛在晚期癌症病人疼痛治疗中的临床效果。方法 :80例晚期癌症病人 ,随机分为 2组 ,每组 40例。吗啡缓释片组 (M组 )口服吗啡缓释片 90~ 2 70mg/d ,分 2次给药 ;病人自控静脉镇痛组 (PCIA组 )的给药方式为“负荷量 +背景量 +病人自控给药量”模式 ,药液配方为枸橼酸芬太尼 3mg ,氟哌利多5mg ,添加生理盐水至 10 0ml。比较两组镇痛效果、治疗费用、病人满意率、不良反应发生率。 结果 :两组日均用药量基本等效。PCIA组镇痛效果较好 ,镇静程度较低 ,不良反应发生率低 ,病人满意率高。结论 :PCIA在晚期癌症镇痛治疗中优点明显 ,安全性较高。 Aim:To compare the clinical analgesic efficacy of controlled-release morphine tablets and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in late stage cancer patients.Methods:Eighty patients were randomly divided into 2 groups with 40 patients in each group.The patients of morphine group were given controlled-release morphine tablets with total dosage of 90~270mg/d,po,twice daily.The patients of PCIA group followed “loading dose+background dose+patients-controlled dose”mode.Fentanyl citrate 3 mg and droperidol 5 mg was resolved in 100 ml normal saline.The analgesic efficacy,cost,and patients’ satisfaction were compared.Results:The average dosages of analgesics in the two groups were almost the same.The patients of PCIA group got better analgesic effects,lower sedative degree,less adverse reaction,and had greater satisfaction.Conclusion:PCIA has apparent advantages in treatment of cancer pain with higher safety.
作者 陶红慧 张英
出处 《上海医药》 CAS 2004年第1期25-27,共3页 Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 口服吗啡缓释片 静脉自控镇痛 晚期 癌性疼痛 疗效比较 patient-controlled intravenous analgesia controlled-release morphine tablets late stage cancer pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Warlleld CA. Controlled - release morphine tablets in patients with chronic cancer pain: a narrative review of controlled clinical trials. Cancer, 1998,82(12) :2299.
  • 2Chumbley GM, Hall GM ,Salmon P, et al. Patient- controlled analgesia:an assessment by 200 patients. Anaesthesia, 1998,53 ( 3 ) :216.
  • 3Egan K J, Ready LB. patient satisfaction with intravenous PCA or epidural morphine. Can J Anaesthesia, 1994,41 ( 1 ) :6.
  • 4Veyckemans F. Analgesia controlled by the patient in pediatrics.Arch Pediatric, 1997,4 (3) :289.
  • 5Mathet CM,Ready LB. Management of acute pain. Br J Hosp Mes,1994,51(3) :85.
  • 6Warfield CA.Controlled-release morphine tablets in patients with chronic cancer pain: a narrative review of controlled clinical trials.Cancer,1998,82(12):2299.
  • 7Chumbley GM,Hall GM,Salmon P,et al.Patient-controlled analgesia:an assessment by 200 patients.Anaesthesia,1998,53(3):216.
  • 8Egan KJ,Ready LB.patient satisfaction with intravenous PCA or epidural morphine.Can J Anaesthesia,1994,41(1):6.
  • 9Veyckemans F.Analgesia controlled by the patient in pediatrics.Arch Pediatric,1997,4(3):289.
  • 10Mathet CM,Ready LB.Management of acute pain.Br J Hosp Mes,1994,51(3):85.

同被引文献14

  • 1邹豪,邵元福,朱才娟,邓渝林,马玉杰,陈盛新.医院药品DDD数排序分析的原理及利用[J].中国药房,1996,7(5):215-217. 被引量:1426
  • 2Narayanan P, Omkara RL, Gopala K, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma and nasopharyngeal allergv: Any correlation? Ear Nose & Throat Journal,2003,82(6) :438-440.
  • 3丁晋澄 王正敏 陆书昌 主编.鼻咽癌[A].王正敏,陆书昌,主编.现代耳鼻咽喉科学[C].北京:人民军医出版社,2000.840-841.
  • 4Low WK, Leong JL, Goh YH, et al. Diagnostic value of Epstein-Barr viral serology in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery, 2000, 123 ( 4 ) : 505-507.
  • 5Kwong DL, Nieholis J, Wei WL, et ol. The time course of histologic remission after treatment of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Cancer, 1999,85(7) : 1446-1453.
  • 6程庆芳 黄鹤年 主编.耳鼻咽喉头颈部肿瘤放射治疗学[A].黄鹤年,主编.现代耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学[C].上海:复旦大学出版社,2003.754-755.
  • 7丘明生 黄鹤年 主编.鼻咽癌[A].黄鹤年,主编.现代耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学[C].上海:复旦大学出版社,2003.167-168.
  • 8King WW, Ku PK, Mok CO, et al. Nasopharyngetomy in the treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a twelve-year experience. Head Neck,2000,22(3) :215-222.
  • 9丘明生.鼻咽癌防治必续[Z].香港:科图有限公司,2004.146-148.
  • 10丘明生 蒋国墚 高志宏.鼻腔与鼻窦恶性肿瘤[A].汤钊猷 主编.现代肿瘤学:第2版[C].上海:上海医科大学出版社,2000.1023-1036.

引证文献2

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部