期刊文献+

基于“是否包含”分类方法的军医大学学员感官学习风格分布比较 被引量:4

Comparison of Sensory Learning Styles Distribution of Military Medical Students Based on the Classification Method of “Whether Contain or Not”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为弥补既往研究感官学习风格分布时将混合学习风格排除在外、信息损失较大的不足,以"是否包含"的分类方法,通过著名的VARK量表,调查了我国3所军医大学5 392名学员,结果显示:(1)学员总体感官学习风格包含V型者占39.5%,不同院校层次、性别、专业、年级学员的比较均未见统计学差异(χ2=2.489,0.104,2.262,4.199;P=0.115,0.747,0.323,0.241)。(2)学员总体感官学习风格包含A型者占57.1%,不同院校层次、性别、专业、年级学员的比较均未见统计学差异(χ2=2.286,0.557,2.294,10.155;P=0.131,0.456,0.318,0.017)。(3)学员总体感官学习风格包含R型者占48.1%,不同性别、专业、年级学员的比较均未见统计学差异(χ2=0.006,7.010,1.820;P=0.938,0.030,0.611),仅不同院校层次的比较有统计学差异(χ2=21.400,P<0.01)。(4)学员总体感官学习风格包含K型者占63.9%,不同院校层次、性别、专业、年级学员的比较均未见统计学差异(χ2=0.010,0.568,0.847,4.656;P=0.920,0.451,0.655,0.199)。(5)按照量表作者原来的分类方法,则学生总体多重风格者最多,占53.5%;其次是K型,占19.3%;再次是A型(13.4%)、R型(9.2%);最后是V型(4.6%)。不同性别、专业、年级学员的比较均未见统计学差异(χ2=2.779,6.428,21.610;P=0.595,0.599,0.042),仅不同院校层次的学员比较有统计学差异(χ2=18.240,P=0.001)。 To compensate for the lack of previous excluding multiple learning styles and losing more information when analyzing sensory learning styles,the 5 392 students in 3 military medial universities were surveyed on with the famous Visual,Aural,Read/Write,Kinesthetic questionnaire based on the classification method of'whether contain or not'.The results showed that(1)The percentage of containing'V'type of Sensory Learning Styles in the whole students was 39.5%,which was no statistical significance in different college levels,genders,specialities and grades(χ2=2.489,0.104,2.262,4.199,P=0.115,0.747,0.323,0.241).(2)The percentage of containing 'A'type was 57.1%,which was neither no statistical significance in the baove groups(χ2=2.286,0.557,2.294,10.155,P=0.131,0.456,0.318,0.017).(3)The percentage of containing'R'type was 48.1%,which was no statistical significance in different genders,specialities and grades(χ2=0.006,7.010,1.820,P=0.938,0.030,0.611),still statistical significance in different college levels(χ2=21.400,P<0.01).(4)The percentage of containing'K'type was 63.9%,which was no statistical significance in different college levels,genders,specialities and grades(χ2=0.010,0.568,0.847,4.656,P=0.920,0.451,0.655,0.199).(5)According to primary classification of the questionnaire author,the maximum percentage was of multiple styles(53.5%),followed by'K'(19.3%),and then'A'(13.4%)and'R'(9.2%),and the least was'V'(4.6%),which was no statistical significance in different genders,specialities and grades(χ2=2.779,6.428,21.610,P=0.595,0.599,0.042),still tatistical significance in different college levels(χ2=18.240,P=0.001).
作者 鲁娟 周文超 LU Juan;ZHOU Wen-chao(Vocational Education Centre,Navy Medical University,Shanghai 200433;Department of Military Common Subjects,Eastern Theater Command Naval Training Base,Shanghai 200433,China)
出处 《医学教育研究与实践》 2019年第2期299-303,共5页 Medical Education Research and Practice
基金 2016年国家自然科学基金(71603269) 2017年度上海市哲学社会科学规划教育学项目(A1706) 2016年中国高等教育学会"十三五"高等教育科学研究规划课题(16YB039) 2018年上海高校本科重点教学改革项目(沪教委高[2017]71号)
关键词 感官学习风格 分布 军医大学 学员 方法 sensory learning styles distribution military medical universities students method
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献41

  • 1Reid J. Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom [ M ].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2002.
  • 2Dunn R. Learning style and its relation to exceptionality at both endsof the spectrum[ J]. Except Child, 1983,49(6) :496-506.
  • 3Curry L. Cognitive and learning styles in medical education[ J]. AcadMed, 1999,74(4) :409413.
  • 4Kolb D A. Experiential learning:Experience as the source of learning and development[ M]. New Jersey:Prentice - Hall, 1984 :83-85.
  • 5Baykan Z, Nacar M. Learning styles of first - year medical studentsattending Erciyes University in Kayseri,Turkey [ J ]. Adv PhysiolEduc,2007,31(2) :158-160.
  • 6徐义鑫.独立学院学习风格测量分析[J].科教导刊:中旬刊,2010,2(3) :5,10.
  • 7Baykan Z, Nacar M. Learning styles of first - year medical studentsattending Erciyes University in Kayseri,Turkey [ J ]. Adv PhysiolEduc,2007,31(2) :158-60.
  • 8D Amore A, James S, Mitchell EK. Learning styles of first - year un-dergraduate nursing and midwifery students : A cross - sectional surveyutilizing the Kolb Learning Style Inventory [ J ]. Nurse Educ Today,2012,32(5);506-15.
  • 9Wilkinson T, Boehan M, Stevenson M. Does learning style influence academic performance in different forms of assessment? [ J ]. J Anat,2014,224(3 ) :304-308.
  • 10A1 - Saud L M. Learning style preferences of first - year dentalstudents at King Saud University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia:Influence of gender and GPA[J]. J Dent Educ,2013,77(10) :1371-1378.

共引文献13

同被引文献43

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部