摘要
目的:比较超声雾化吸入与氧气雾化吸入方法的疗效。方法:回顾性分析超声雾化吸入和氧气雾化吸入患者各350例,观察两种吸入方法患者的满意度和治疗情况。结果:使用超声雾化吸入患者350例,出现胸闷、气急、呼吸困难等不适症状40例,治疗中途停止;使用氧气雾化吸入患者350例,仅有5例出现轻微呛咳、头晕等不适症状,治疗继续情况良好。结论:氧气雾化吸入疗法优于超声雾化吸入疗法。
Objective:To compare the efficacy of two kinds of aerosol inhalation method.Methods:Retrospective analysis of ultrasonic atomizing inhalation and oxygen inhalation in patients of the 350 cases,observation of satisfaction and treatment two patients with inhalation method.Results:The use of ultrasonic atomizing inhalation in 350 patients,chest tightness,shortness of breath,breathing difficulties and other symptoms in 40 cases,treatment of stop;using oxygen inhalation in 350 patients,only 5 cases had mild cough,dizziness and other symptoms,treatment continued in good condition.Conclusion:Oxygen inhalation therapy is better than ultrasonic atomizing inhalation therapy.
关键词
超声雾化吸入
氧气雾化吸入
疗效
Ultrasonic atomizing inhalation
Oxygen inhalation
Effect
