Mile手术与保肛手术治疗直肠癌的疗效比较

Curative effect comparison of Mile operation and anus preserving operation in the treatment of rectal cancer

目的:分析比较Mile手术与保肛手术治疗直肠癌的临床效果。方法:收治直肠癌患者60例,对患者病历资料进行回顾性分析,并将其分为试验组和对照组,每组30例,对照组采取常规Mile手术疗法;试验组采用保肛手术治疗,观察两组的临床效果。结果:试验组的临床疗效要高于对照组,两组之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:临床中,对直肠癌患者采用保肛手术进行治疗较常规Mile手术疗法更好,不仅能取得满意的临床疗效,使患者的病情明显好转,还可以有效改善患者的临床治疗效果。

Objective:Analysis and comparison the clinical effect of Mile operation and anus preserving operation in the treatment of rectal cancer.Methods:60 patients with rectal cancer were selected.The clinical data of patients were retrospectively analyzed.All patients were divided into the experimental group and the control group with 30 cases in each.The control group was treated with normal Mile operation therapy in clinical treatment.The experimental group was treated with the anus preserving operation treatment.The clinical effects of two groups were observed.Results:In the two groups,the clinical effect of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:In clinical,the anus preserving operation in the treatment of patients with rectal cancer is better than conventional Mile operation therapy.The anus preserving operation not only can obtain satisfying clinical curative effect,made the patient's condition improved markedly,but also can effectively improve the clinical curative effect of patients.