期刊文献+

尼莫地平与纳洛酮治疗颅脑损伤的间接Meta分析

Indirect Meta analysis of nimodipine andnaloxone intreatment of craniocerebral injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:系统评价尼莫地平和纳洛酮治疗颅脑损伤的疗效。方法:以间接Meta分析的方法对已有研究进行合并,系统评价两种药物治疗颅脑损伤的GOS恢复良好率。结果:尼莫地平和纳洛酮的GOS恢复良好率分别为65.22%和61.10%。结论:在治疗颅脑损伤GOS恢复良好率方面,尼莫地平与纳洛酮基本相似,尼莫地平略好于纳洛酮。 Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy of nimodipine and naloxone in the treatment of craniocerebral injury.Methods:We combined the existing research using indirect meta analysis,and systematically evaluated GOS good recovery rate of two kinds of drugs in the treatment of craniocerebral injury.Results:GOS good recovery rate of nimodipine and naloxone were65.22% and 61.10% respectively.Conclusion:The GOS good recovery rate in the treatment of craniocerebral injury,nimodipine and naloxone have similar effect,but nimodipine is slightly better.
出处 《中国社区医师(医学专业)》 2014年第18期17-18,共2页
关键词 颅脑损伤 纳洛酮 尼莫地平 间接Meta分析 Craniocerebral injury Naloxone Nimodipine Indirect Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1邱炜,黄娜,姚雪峰,常会民.纳洛酮早期应用对急性中重型颅脑损伤神经功能恢复的探讨[J].华中医学杂志,2006,30(3):185-186. 被引量:4
  • 2王爱娜,苏维国.尼莫地平注射液[J].中国新药杂志,1996,5(5):341-342. 被引量:15
  • 3Jeroen P. Jansen,Rachael Fleurence,Beth Devine,Robbin Itzler,Annabel Barrett,Neil Hawkins,Karen Lee,Cornelis Boersma,Lieven Annemans,Joseph C. Cappelleri.Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1[J].Value in Health.2011(4)
  • 4David C. Hoaglin,Neil Hawkins,Jeroen P. Jansen,David A. Scott,Robbin Itzler,Joseph C. Cappelleri,Cornelis Boersma,David Thompson,Kay M. Larholt,Mireya Diaz,Annabel Barrett.Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices—Part 2[J].Value in Health.2011(4)

二级参考文献4

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部