摘要
目的:分析研究慢性硬膜下血肿采取钻孔引流术与微创穿刺术的临床治疗效果。方法:2011年3月-2014年3月收治慢性硬膜下血肿患者100例,随机分为试验组和对照组,各50例。对照组实施钻孔引流术给予治疗,试验组实施微创穿刺术给予治疗,对两组临床治疗效果给予对比分析。结果:试验组平均手术时间、平均住院天数以及手术后残余液量明显低于对照组,两组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:慢性硬膜下血肿采取微创穿刺术治疗,具有操作简便、手术时间以及住院天数较短等优点,具有临床推广价值。
Objective:To analyze the clinical effect of trepanation and drainage and minimally invasive puncture in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma.Methods:100 cases with chronic subdural hematoma were selected from March 2011 to March 2014.They were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group with 50 cases in each.The control group were treated with surgery of trepanation and drainage,and the experimental group were treated with minimally invasive surgery.Then compare the clinical treatment effect of the two groups.Results:The average operation time,average hospitalization days and the residual liquid volume after operation of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group.The difference was statistically significant between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion:Minimally invasive surgery treated on chronic subdural hematoma has the advantages of simply,shorten operation time and hospitalization time,so it is worthy of clinical application.
关键词
慢性硬膜下血肿
微创穿刺术
钻孔引流术
对比分析
Chronic subdural hematoma
Minimally invasive surgery
Trepanation and drainage
Comparative analysis
