腹股沟疝无张力修补术与传统疝修补术效果比较

Comparison of the effect of the tension free inguinal hernia repair and the traditional hernia repair

目的:对比腹股沟疝患者行传统疝修补术与无张力修补术的临床效果。方法:2011年1月-2014年1月收治腹股沟疝患者90例,随机分为对照组与观察组,每组45例,对照组行传统疝修补术,观察组行无张力修补术,对比两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、下床时间、住院时间以及并发症发生率。结果:两组经治疗后,对照组的手术时间、术中出血量、下床时间、住院时间以及并发症发生率明显高于观察组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹股沟疝患者行无张力修补术可有效缩短手术时间、下床时间与住院时间,且术中出血量少、并发症发生率低,效果明显优于传统疝修补术,值得推广。

Objective:To compare the clinical effect of patients with inguinal hernia treated by traditional hernia repair and tension free repair.Methods: 90 patients with inguinal hernia were selected from January 2011 to January 2014.They were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 45 cases in each.The control group received traditional hernia repair,and the observation group underwent tension-free hernia repair.We compared the operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,bed time,hospitalization time and incidence of complications of two groups patients.Results:After the treatment of two groups,the operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,getting out of bed time,hospitalization time and incidence of complications of the control group were significantly higher than those of the observation group,and the differences between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Inguinal hernia underwent tension-free hernia repair can effectively shorten the operation time,bed time and hospitalization time,and with less blood loss,lower complication rate,and the effect is better than the traditional hernia repair,so it is worthy of promotion.