期刊文献+

慢快综合征患者植入起搏器后参数调整对预后的影响分析 被引量:1

Impact analysis of adjustment of the parameters on the prognosis of slow fast syndrome patients with pacemaker
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析慢快综合征患者植入起搏器后参数调整对预后的影响。方法:2011年7月-2014年7月收治慢快综合征患者68例,随机分为对照组和研究组各42例,两组均植入起搏器,对照组起搏心率设置为65次/min,研究组设置为55次/min,比较两组相关参数、生活质量SF-36量表评分及心房纤颤发生率。结果:研究组Ap、Vp均低于对照组,且LVEDD、LVEF改善情况均优于对照组,有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组血脑钠钛浓度(BNP)显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组SF-36量表评分显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组心房纤颤发生率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:慢快综合征患者植入起搏器后,适当地降低起搏心率可有效降低BNP,从而降低心房纤颤发生率,改善患者远期预后。 Objective:To explore the impact of adjustment of the parameters on the prognosis of slow fast syndrome patients with pacemaker.Methods:68 patients with slow fast syndrome were selected from July 2011 to July 2014.They were randomly divided into the control group and the study group with 42 cases in each group.Two groups were implanted pacemaker.In the control group,pacing rate was 65 times/min;in the study group,pacing rate was 55 times/min.We compared the relevant parameters,life quality SF-36 scale score and incidence of atrial fibrillation.Results:In the study group,Ap,Vp were lower than that of the control group,and LVEDD,LVEF improvement were better than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);in the study group,BNP was significantly lower than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);in the study group,SF-36 scale score was significantly higher than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);in the study group,atrial fibrillation rate was significantly lower than that of control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:In slow fast syndrome patients after implantation of pacemaker,reducing the rate of pacing appropriately can effectively decrease the BNP,so as to reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation and improve the prognosis of the patients.
出处 《中国社区医师》 2015年第4期27-28,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 慢快综合征 起搏器 参数调整 预后 Slow fast syndrome Pacemaker Parameter adjustment Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1张建军,杨新春,胡大一,商丽华,汪爱虎,陈明.462例永久起搏器置入术并发症的相关因素分析及防治对策[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2004,18(6):456-457. 被引量:64
  • 2朱锐,廖志坚,李素珍,叶剑文.起搏器置入术后出现囊袋血肿三例[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2005,19(5):346-346. 被引量:21
  • 3朱冰船,刘启明,杨宇,祁述善,周胜华.触发心房颤动的房性期前收缩特征及抗心房颤动起搏器的疗效[J].临床心血管病杂志,2007,23(3):174-176. 被引量:6
  • 4Hildick smithd DJ, Lowe MD, Newell SA, et al. Ventricular pacenmker upgrade : experience, complications and recommendations [J]. Heart, 1998, 79 (4): 383-387.
  • 5Ra jappan K. Perm an ent paeenmker implantation technique: Part 1 arrhythmias [J]. Heart, 2009, 95 (3): 259-264.
  • 6Link MS, Estes NA 3rd, Griffin J J, et al. Complications of dual chamber pacemaker implantation in the elderly. Pacemaker selectionin the elderly (PASE) investigators [J]. lnterv Card Electrophysiol, 1998. 2: 175-179.
  • 7Nitardy A, Langreck H, Dietz R, et al. Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction through programming a long atrioventricular delay along with the DDIR mode. Clin Res Cardiol, 2009, 98:25-32.
  • 8Mitro P, Kotianova A, Bodnar J, et al. Quality of life and psychological well-being in patients with various pacing modes. Bratisl Lek Listy,2008, 109:260-266.
  • 9Mont L,Ruiz-Granell R,Martinez JG,et al. Impact of anti-tachycardia pacing on atrial fibrillation burden when added on top of preventive pacing algorithms: results of the prevention or termination (POT) trial. Europace, 2008,10:28-34.
  • 10Van Eck Jw,Van Hemel Nm,Van den Bos A,et al. Predictors of improved quality of life 1 year after pacemaker implantation.Am Heart,2008, 156:491-497.

共引文献14

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部