期刊文献+

DHS和PFNA固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折疗效比较 被引量:11

Comparison of the effects of DHS and PFNA fixation in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨DHS和PFNA固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法:2012年9月-2013年6月收治老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者50例,随机分为对照组和观察组各25例,观察组采用DHS治疗,对照组采用PFEN治疗,观察两组的治疗效果。结果:经治疗,观察组的手术时间、术中出血量、负重时间以及骨折愈合时间等手术相关指标明显优于对照组,术后Harris疗效优良率明显高于对照组(92.0%VS 64.0%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与DHS相比,PFNA固定法治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折,治疗有效率与安全性都比较高,值得临床推广。 Objective:To explore the effects of DHS and PFNA fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly.Methods:50 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture were selected from September 2012 to June 2013. They were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 25 cases in each group.The observation group were treated with DHS,while the control group were treated with PFEN.We observed the effect of treatment of the two groups. Results:After the treatment,in the observation group,operation time,amount of bleeding during operation,weight loading time and the time of fracture healing were significantly better than the control group;after operation,the excellent and good rate of Harris was significantly higher than that of control group(92% VS 64%);the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with DHS,PFNA fixation method was used for the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly,and the effective rate of the treatment and safety were relatively high.It was worth the clinical promotion.
作者 查天文
出处 《中国社区医师》 2015年第4期54-54,56,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 DHS PFEN 老年股骨粗隆间骨折 疗效 DHS PFEN Intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly Curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1高堂成,张春才,王秋根,王家林,许硕贵.老年患者不稳定性股骨转子间骨折的术式选择[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(9):966-969. 被引量:73
  • 2唐佩福,姚琦,黄鹏,梁雨田,陶笙,郭义柱,张群,梁向党,屈波,王岩.股骨近端髓内钉-螺旋刀片治疗高龄骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2007,9(7):622-624. 被引量:283
  • 3卢世璧,译.坎贝尔骨科手术学[M]10版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2005:2284-2297
  • 4Dominique CR,Pangiotis K, Laurent F, et al. Use of an intramedullar hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate fointer- troehanteric femoral fracture[J]. Bone Joint Surg(Am) , 1998,80(5): 618.
  • 5Simmennacher RK, Bosch AM, Van derWerken C. The AO/ASIF- proxinral femoralnail( PFN ) : a new device for the treatmentofunstable proximal femoral fractures[J]. Injury, 1999, 30(5 ) : 327 - 332.
  • 6王澍寰,荣国威.实用骨科学(积水潭)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008,453.
  • 7Jensen JS. Classification of trochanteric fractures [ J ]. Acta Orthop Scand, 1980,51 (5) : 803 - 810.
  • 8Bergeron E, Moore L, Fournier K, et al. Patients with isola- ted hip fracture must be considered for surgery irrespective- ly of their age, comorbidity status and provenance : a state- ment applicable even to nonagerians [ J ]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2009,129 ( 11 ) ~ 1549 - 1555.
  • 9Thomas R,William M.骨科治疗的AO原则[M].北京:华夏出版社,2010:442-443.
  • 10Mereddy P, Kamath S, Ramakrishnan M, et al. The AO/ ASIF proximal nail antirotation (PFNA) : a new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures [ J ]. In- jury,2009,40(4) :428 -432.

共引文献178

同被引文献67

引证文献11

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部