期刊文献+

会阴无保护接生技术在低危孕妇正常分娩中的应用 被引量:13

Application of perineum unprotected delivering technology in normal delivery of low-risk pregnant women
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析会阴无保护接生技术在低危孕妇正常分娩中的应用价值。方法:2013年6月-2014年5月收治初产妇192例,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组96例。对照组采用常规接生技术分娩,观察组采用会阴无保护接生技术分娩,比较两组产妇的会阴情况、产程时间及不良妊娠结局发生情况。结果:观察组会阴侧切率29.17%,对照组51.04%,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组产妇会阴Ⅰ度裂伤率高于对照组,Ⅱ度裂伤率低于对照组,比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组的第二产程时间短于对照组,产后出血发生率和新生儿窒息率明显低于对照组,组间比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在低危孕妇正常分娩中采用会阴无保护接生技术可降低会阴侧切率,提高分娩舒适度,降低产后出血率和新生儿窒息率,值得临床推广应用。 Objective:To analyze the application of perineum unprotected delivering technology in normal delivery of low-risk pregnant women.Methods:192 cases of unipara from June 2013 to May 2014 were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group,with 96 cases in each group.The control group had conventional delivering technology,the observation group adopted perineum unprotected delivering technology,the perineum situation,lasting time and adverse pregnancy outcomes of the two groups were compared.Results:The episiotomy rate of the observation group was 29.17%,and that of the control group was51.04%,there was statistical significance difference between the two groups(P<0.05).The perineal Ⅰ degree laceration rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,Ⅱ degree laceration rate was lower than that of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The second stages of the observation group were shorter than that of the control group,the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal asphyxia rate were significantly lower than that of the control group,the differences were statistically significant between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusions:Perineum unprotected delivering technology applied in normal childbirth of low-risk pregnant women could reduce the episiotomy rate,improve the labor comfort and reduce the rate of postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal asphyxia rate,worthy of clinical popularization and application.
作者 陈丽
出处 《中国社区医师》 2015年第10期55-56,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 会阴无保护接生技术 低危孕妇 正常分娩 Perineum unprotected delivering technology Low-risk pregnant women Normal delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献50

  • 1项静.浅谈分娩中的会阴保护[J].实用医技杂志,2005,12(10A):2828-2828. 被引量:13
  • 2Carroli G,Belizan J,范建霞.会阴切开术与阴道分娩[J].生殖与避孕,2006,26(3):178-180. 被引量:10
  • 3董金林,倪美菊,朱钟治.会阴Ⅲ度撕裂50例分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,1996,12(3):153-154. 被引量:17
  • 4王炳顺,周利锋,高尔生,朱丽萍,高晓玲.产妇产后对分娩方式的再认识[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(20):2784-2787. 被引量:32
  • 5Hartmann K, Kiswanathan M, Palmieri R, et al. Outcomes of routine episiotomy : a systematic review [ J ]. JAMA, 2005,293 (17) : 2141-2148.
  • 6Bansal RK, Tan WM, Ecker JL, et al. Is There a Benefit to E- pisiotomy at Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery? A Natural Experi- ment[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996,175(4) : 897- 901.
  • 7谷祖善 赵霞.应不应该做会阴切开.实用妇产科杂志,1993,:275-275.
  • 8Sartorc A, DeSeta F, Maso G, et al. The effect of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery[ J]. Ob- stet Gynecal,2004, 103 : 669-673.
  • 9Clemons JL, Towers GD, McClure GB, et al. Decreased anal sphincter laceration associated with restrictive episiotomy use [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2005, 192: 1620-1625.
  • 10Hueston WJ. Factors associated with the use of episiotomy during vaginal delivery[ J~. Obstet Gynecol, 1996,87 (6) : 1001-1005.

共引文献319

同被引文献61

引证文献13

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部