司法公信视角下刑事裁判文书的深层表达——以刑事审判中强化量刑说理为切入

Deep Expression of Criminal Judgment Documents from A Judicial Credibility Perspective——From the Point of “Reasoning”

"理由是裁判的灵魂"。司法实践中,不少刑事判决往往是语焉不详,浅尝辄止,办案法官套用着固定的公文格式:如对公诉人的量刑建议,不经推理就断言"本案事实清楚,证据确凿";对被告人及其辩护人的量刑辩护,直接地以"于法无据,本院不予采信"打发了事;对被害人的量刑意见,则基本没有涉及。有的刑事裁判文书仅仅一句"鉴于本案的具体情况",表面看似颇有针对性,实则无的放矢。有关部门显然也意识到了这个问题,2010年,最高人民法院《人民法院量刑程序指导意见(试行)》(以下简称《指导意见》)和"两高三部"《关于规范量刑程序若干问题的意见(试行)》(以下简称《意见》)相继发布。然而现实效果并不如预期。实际上,刑事裁判文书中的量刑不只是"说理"这么简单,还包括逻辑、修辞等方方面面,可谓是一门司法艺术。

"Reasoning is the soul of judgments". In judicial practice, many criminal judgments are vague, irrational. Some judges always using the set forms, such as "the case facts are clear, the evidences are conclusive", "there is no admissible evidence". Some criminal judgments contain the sentence-"in view of the specific situation of this case", it seems specific, but actually is random. Since that, in 2010, the Supreme People's court sentenced "A Guidance of Sentencing(Trial) " and" on Several Issues Concerning the Standardization of Sentencing Program Views(Trial) ". However, the response is not as good as expected. In fact, a criminal judgment is not just simple "reasoning", but including logic, rhetoric, etc. It can be described as a judicial art.