论司法互助取得言词证据在台湾地区证据能力认定路径之变迁

Changes in The Identification of The Admissibility of Testimonial Evidence Taken Abroad by Mutual Legal Assistance in Taiwan Region

通过两岸司法互助取得的言词证据的证据能力认定,面临台湾地区制度面的困难。《海峡两岸共同打击犯罪及司法互助协议》实施以来,台湾地区法院在"法律审"中,运用类推适用等方法,将请求大陆方面取得的证据纳入"传闻证据例外"的范围加以评价,形成了具体认定路径。台湾地区法院通过"统一法律见解"进一步明确了司法互助取证的证据能力认定规则。相关路径为提升两岸司法互助的效能提供了保障,但也面临来自台湾地区学理发展与"司法改革"的影响。

The identification of the admissibility of testimonial evidence,which obtained through the CrossStrait legal assistance,is faced with institutional difficulties in Taiwan region.Since the implementation of the Agreement on Joint Fight against Crime and Mutual Legal Assistant,in the'legal trial',the Taiwan district court has applied the analogy and other methods to bring the evidence which obtained from the mainland into the scope of'hearsay evidence exception'for judgment,and formed the specific identification rules for the admissibility of evidence.Through the'the Unified Legal Interpretations System',Taiwan’s courts further clarified the identification rules for the admissibility of evidence which the evidence obtained through mutual legal assistance,these rules provide a guarantee for improving the efficiency of the Cross-Strait legal assistance,but they are also affected by the development of academic theories and judicial reform in Taiwan region.