期刊文献+

随机对照试验中常见误区辨识与应对 被引量:4

Common Misconceptions in Randomized Controlled Trials
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随机对照试验是评估不同干预措施疗效和常见不良反应的标准设计方案,但我国随机对照试验在研究设计、实施、效应指标选择、数据分析和结果解释等方面仍有提升空间。本文从随机对照试验实施的关键技术、结果展示和结果解读3方面分析了6点常见误区,期望帮助临床研究者明确随机化概念,正确实施随机分配方法和分配方案隐藏、正确理解随机对照试验中的基线平衡问题、合理选择效应指标、正确解读研究结果的统计学意义和临床意义,以生产更多高质量的随机对照试验证据,同时避免被误导。 A well-conducted randomized controlled trial( RCT) is considered the gold standard for comparing the efficacy and common adverse events of different interventions. However,for China’s RCTs,there is still room for the improvement in research design,implementation,selection of effective measures,data analysis,and interpretation of results. In this article,we present six misunderstandings or errors to help clinicians in clarifying the concept of randomization,correctly implementing the process of randomization and concealment of allocation,understanding the baseline imbalance in RCTs,reasonably selecting effective measuers,and correctly interpreting the statistical significance and clinical significance in an effort to produce more RCTs of highquality and protect clinicians from potentially misleading presentations and interpretations of research findings.
作者 李静 孙欢 李永弘 LI Jing;SUN Huan;LI Yong-hong(Research Center of Evidence Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China)
出处 《协和医学杂志》 CSCD 2019年第2期166-171,共6页 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
基金 公益性行业科研专项(201502024)
关键词 随机对照试验 分配方案隐藏 比值比 风险比 亚组分析 randomized controlled trial allocation concealment odds ratio risk ratio subgroup analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献40

  • 1闫世艳,姚晨,夏结来.简单随机化、中心分层区组随机化和最小化法的均衡性比较[J].中国循证医学杂志,2006,6(5):376-379. 被引量:35
  • 2TREASURE T, MACRAE KD. Minimization: the platinum standard fo trials? Randomization doesn't guarantee similarity of groups, minimization does[J]. BMJ, 1998, 317(7155) :362 -363.
  • 3POCOCK S, SIMON R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial[ J ]. Biometrics, 1975, 31 ( 1 ) : 103 - 115.
  • 4BROWN S,THORPE H ,HAWKINS K,et al. Minimization-reducing predictability for muhi-centre trials whilst retaining balance within centre [ J ]. Star Med, 2005,24 ( 24 ) : 3715 - 3727.
  • 5OLSSON ULF. The method of minimization proposed by pocock and simon-properties with regards to balance and inferential validity[ D]. Uppsala university department of information science, statistics. 2004.
  • 6BEGG C, IGLEWICZ B. A treatment allocation procedure for sequential clinical trials [ J ]. Biometrics, 1980,36 ( 1 ) : 81 - 90.
  • 7KLOTZ J. Maximum entropy constrained balance randomization for clinical triaL[J]. Biometrics, 1978, 34(2) :283 -287.
  • 8TITTERINGTON D. On constrained balance randomization for clinical trials[J]. Biometrics, 1983, 39(4) :1083 -1086.
  • 9HOFMEIJER J, ANEMA PC, van der TWEEL I. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials [ J ]. J Clln Epidemiol, 2008, 61 (2) : 119 - 124.
  • 10VICKERS A. How to randomize[J]. J Soc Int Oncol, 2006,4 (4): 194-198.

共引文献33

同被引文献46

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部