期刊文献+

违法所得没收程序适用问题研究——以“陈西受贿案”为例 被引量:1

Research on the Illegal Confiscation Procedure——Taking the Case of Chen Xiasan Example
原文传递
导出
摘要 违法所得没收程序是反腐败的重要法律制度,但在当前适用较少,理论研究也多限于立法建议。由"陈西受贿案"可以发现,违法所得没收程序在实际运用中暴露出诸多亟待解决的问题。当利害关系人参与违法所得没收程序时,其诉讼地位类似有独立请求权第三人,并享有一定的诉讼权利。其在违法所得没收程序中承担提出证据的责任,并有权申请启动非法证据排除程序。 Illegal income confiscation procedures are important legal systems of anti-corruption,but the application and theoretical research are limited to legislative proposals.It is found that there are many problems to be solved in the illegal confiscation procedures by 'Chen Xi case'.When the interested party participates in the illegal confiscation procedure,the litigation status is similar to that of the third party with independent claim and has certain right of litigation.The interested party is responsible for the presentation of evidence in the forfeiture procedure and has the right to apply for the commencement of the illegal evidence exclusion procedure.
作者 马康
出处 《中国刑警学院学报》 2017年第4期13-18,共6页 Journal of Criminal Investigation Police University of China
基金 国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(编号:201607070111)
关键词 违法所得没收程序 利害关系人 有独立请求权第三人 证明责任 非法证据排除 Illegal confiscation procedures Stakeholder Third party with independent claim Proof of liability Exclusion of illegal evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

共引文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部