期刊文献+

“计算机理解”论题的探究——从“中文屋论证”到“比较三段论论证”

Study on “Computer Understanding” Thesis——from “Chinese Room Argument” to “Comparative Syllogism Argument”
原文传递
导出
摘要 塞尔的"中文屋论证"名义上是探讨"计算机能否理解"问题,实质是在反对"程序理解"。"中文屋论证"及其哲学争论对于"计算机理解"的认知有重要意义。比较三段论是一种探讨"计算机理解"的新方法,它是通过人类与计算机各方面的比较,得出智能机具有理解的可能性。 Searle’s "Chinese Room Argument" in name of discussing the question of "Computer Understanding", however, the essence was opposing the possibility of "Program Understanding"". Through the elaboration of CRA and the correlative cognitive debates, there are some queries to the CRA in the article, then we put in a new method for demonstrating the possibility of "Computer Understanding".
出处 《心智与计算》 2008年第3期244-251,共8页 Mind and Computation
关键词 计算机理解 人的理解 中文屋论证 比较三段论论证 computer understanding human understanding Chinese room argument comparative syllogism argument
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1高新民著.现代西方心灵哲学[M]. 武汉出版社, 1996
  • 2Hodges A,Turing A.Alan turing:the enigma[]..1983
  • 3Hauser L.Nixin’goes to China[].Views into the Chinese Room:New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence.2002
  • 4http://news.csdn.net/n/20040620/19951.html .
  • 5Warwick K.Alien encounters[].Views into the Chinese Room:New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence.2002
  • 6Dennett D C.Brainstorms:philosophical essays on mind and psychology[]..1978
  • 7Turing,A. M.Computing machinery and intelligence[].Mind.1950
  • 8Searle,J.Minds, brains, and programs[].The Behavioral and Brain Sciences.1980
  • 9Searle,J.R.Consciousness, explanatory inversion, and cognitive science[].Behavioral and Brain Sciences.1990

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部