摘要
在断代文学史书写中,易代之际作家的时代归属是一个十分重要的问题。以往的划分往往是以各人的政治选择作为依据,由此造成对某些文学现象的理解与文学历史实际之间出现偏差。考察元末明初诗人的类型,可以看出,历代文苑传、诗文评、诗选在所列"明初"诗人时,多以其政治归属作为基本准则,而往往忽略其作为易代之际诗人的特殊性,由此在文学史认识上出现误识。文章通过对明初诗分五派等看法予以辨析,试图为理解文学历史的演进和重写中国文学史提供新的视角。
To decide the status of writers is an important issue in writing the history of Chinese literature between dynasties. The former decision is often based on their political stance, resulting in a deviation between the understanding of certain literary phenomena and the historical reality of literature. To investigate poets between the Yuan Dynasty and the Ming Dynasty revealed that poets of the early Ming Dynasty in biographies, poetry reviews and anthologies were ascertained by their political stances, which neglects the particularity of the poets in the history of literature. This paper differentiated and analyzed the views of the five poems in the early Ming Dynasty so as to provide a new angle of view for understanding the evolution of the literary history and rewriting the history of Chinese literature.
出处
《新疆大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2017年第4期99-106,共8页
Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"明代诗史流变研究"(15JJDZONGHE017)
武汉大学自主科研项目"明代道教文学史"
国家"万人计划"青年拔尖人才计划
武汉大学青年学术团队发展计划支持
关键词
元末明初
易代作家
文学史
文学历史的图像
The Late Yuan Dynasty
The Early Ming Dynasty
Writers between Dynasties
Literary History
Literary History Images