期刊文献+

“景”“境”之别与明清人情景论之偏失 被引量:2

On Differences between "Landscape" and "Poetic Image" and Deficiency of Perspectives of Chinese of Ming Dynasty and Qing Dynasty on Relationship between Emotion and Landscape
原文传递
导出
摘要 意境范畴中的“境界”概念源自佛家,有两个基本涵义:一是主体所处的外在时空;二是主体意识状态。作为时空之境,它不等于“景”而包含“景”。明清人以“景”充“境”并以情景关系论意境,犯了不相称的逻辑错误,无法对意境作出正确界定。文章认为意境是未经充分言说的特定时空的感悟。 The concept poetic image, from Buddhism, means two things: the time and space subject lives in and the consciousness of subject. Obviously, poetic image includes landscape, Chinese of Ming Dynasty and Qing Dynasty made a logic mistake in equating 'landscape' and 'poetic image' and confining poetic image to emotion and landscape relations. This not only misled the definition of poetic image, but also hindered application of poetic image studies to prose and novel. Poetic image is a feeling of specific time and space without being expressed clearly in words.
作者 段振良
出处 《清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第6期23-28,共6页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 “景” “境” 意境 时空感悟 审美意识 明朝 landscape poetic image deficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1余嘉锡.世说新语笺疏[M].北京:中华书局,1983..
  • 2胡应麟.诗薮·内篇[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1979.1.
  • 3李泽厚.美学论集[M].上海:上海文艺出版社,1982.325.
  • 4《百子全书》卷一,浙江人民出版社,1984年版.
  • 5《景德传灯录》卷四,《佛藏要籍选刊》,第13册,上海古籍出版社1994年版,第536页.
  • 6李贽.《焚书·杂说》,北京师范大学中文系文艺理论教研室编.《中国古代文论选注》,陕西人民出版社,1983年版,第397页.

共引文献65

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部