期刊文献+

资质过剩感与亲组织不道德行为:心理特权与谦卑型领导的作用 被引量:24

Effect of Perceived Overqualification on Unethical ProOrganizational Behavior:The Role of Psychological Entitlement and Humble Leadership
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用自我评价理论视角,并采用两阶段追踪调查问卷方法收集数据,探讨了资质过剩感与亲组织不道德行为的关系以及心理特权和谦卑型领导在两者关系中的作用机制。实证分析结果表明:资质过剩感显著正向影响心理特权,心理特权在资质过剩感与亲组织不道德行为之间起到中介作用,谦卑型领导显著负向调节资质过剩感与心理特权的关系。研究对管理实践有一定的启示,丰富了资质过剩感和亲组织不道德行为理论。 Perceived overqualification refers to an employment situation in which employees feel that they possess surplus qualifications relative to what a job requires.Due to changes in both the composition of the workforce and the economy,overqualification has become a common and important issue.Research on perceived overqualification has mainly focused on its negative consequences,such as low levels of organizational commitment and job satisfaction,counterproductive behaviors and organizational deviance behaviors.However,there is no research on unethical pro-organizational behavior.Unethical behavior in the workplace has been widely reported in the last decades.Especially,an emerging stream of research has begun to systematically theorize and investigate unethical pro-organizational behavior.However,the mechanism of perceived overqualification on unethical pro-organizational behavior is still unknown.In view of this,we proposed a moderated-mediation model to uncover the underlying mechanism and the boundary conditions of the relationship between perceived overqualification and unethical pro-organizational behavior.Drawing upon selfevaluation theory,we hypothesized that perceived overqualification is indirectly related to unethical pro-organizational behavior through psychological entitlement.We further proposed that humble leadership weakened this hypothesized relationship.To test those hypotheses,we collected a two-wave field data,one month apart from each other,from a group of real estate and manufacturing employees of companies located in Beijing and Hebei province.Perceived overqualification and humble leadership are studied in the first survey,and psychological entitlement and unethical pro-organizational behavior are studied in the second survey.Three-hundred-ninety-two employees completed the two-wave survey.We applied regression analysis,bootstrap methods and multilevel structural equation modeling to analyze the data,and we adopted SPSS 21.0 and Mplus7.0 software to do the analysis.The result of data analysis showed that:(1)Perceived overqualification significantly and positively affected psychological entitlement,and psychological entitlement significantly and positively affected unethical pro-organizational behavior;(2)Psychological entitlement partially mediated the relationship between perceived overqualification and unethical pro-organizational behavior;(3)Humble leadership negatively moderated the link of perceived overqualification-psychological entitlement,that is,the higher the level of humble leadership,the weaker the relationship between perceived overqualification and psychological entitlement was;on the contrary,the relationship was stronger.Overall,in order to better understand perceived overqualification in unethical pro-organizational behavior,this study developed a moderated mediation model to examine the complementary relationship,but it was not verified by the present data.Our findings were among the first to demonstrate the relationship between perceived overqualification and unethical pro-organizational behavior,and to explore the psychological mechanism and boundary conditions.Theoretical contributions in this study included several aspects:(a)By investigating the driving factors of unethical pro-organizational behavior in organizations,our research filled the research gap of unethical proorganizational behavior in organization,but also expanded the direction of research on perceived overqualification;(b)By identifying the mediating role of psychological entitlement,our research uncovered the influencing path of perceived overqualification on unethical pro-organizational behavior;(c)By examining the moderating role of humble leadership,our research offered a more comprehensive view of under what conditions that employees with high perceived overqualification were more likely not to exhibit unethical pro-organizational behavior.
作者 褚福磊 王蕊 Chu Fulei;Wang Rui(College of Business Administration,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing,100070;Department of Economic Management,Tangshan Normal University,Tangshan,063020)
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第2期365-371,共7页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 阐释党的十九大精神国家社科基金专项立项项目(18VSJ084) 国家自然科学基金项目(71702115) 北京市优秀人才青年拔尖团队项目(2017000026833TD01) 北京市委组织部优秀人才项目(2017000020124G138)的资助
关键词 资质过剩感 亲组织不道德行为 心理特权 谦卑型领导 perceived overqualification pro-organizational behavior psychological entitlement humble leadership
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献117

  • 1周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3653
  • 2郭晓薇.权力距离感对公平感与组织公民行为关系的调节作用研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(2):433-436. 被引量:23
  • 3沈伊默.从社会交换的角度看组织认同的来源及效益[J].心理学报,2007,39(5):918-925. 被引量:64
  • 4魏钧,陈中原,张勉.组织认同的基础理论、测量及相关变量[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(6):948-955. 被引量:103
  • 5Morris J A, Brotheridge C M, Urbanski J C. Bringing humility to leadership:Antecedents and consequences of leader humility [ J ] . Human Relations, 2005,58 (10) :1323-1350.
  • 6Oc B, Bashshur M R, Daniels M A, Greguras G J, Diefendorff J M. Leader humility in Singapore [ J ] . The Leadership Quarterly, 2015,26( 1 ) :68-80.
  • 7Nielsen R, Marrone J A, Slay H S. A new look at humility:Exploring the humility concept and its role in socialized charismatic leadership [ J ]. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2010,17 (1):33 -43.
  • 8Owens B P, Hekman D R. Modeling how to grow:An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes [ J ]. The Academy of Management Journal, 2012,55 (4) :787-818.
  • 9Collins J. Level 5 leadership : The triumph of humility and fierce resolve [ J ]. Harvard Business Review, 2005 (July-Auguest) : 1 - 13.
  • 10Ou A Y, Tsui A S, Kinicki A J, Waldman D A, Xiao Z, Song L J. Humble chief executive officers' con- nections to top management team integration and mid- dle managers' responses [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2014,59( 1 ) :34-72.

共引文献254

同被引文献231

引证文献24

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部