期刊文献+

契约参与度对人际信任的影响

The Effects of Contract Involvement on Interpersonal Trust
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从契约制定过程角度,探究个体制定契约参与度对人际信任的影响及其机制。现场研究结果表明参与制定宿舍契约能提升宿舍人际信任,认同感在其中起中介作用。实验室实验结果表明:契约参与度不但能提升被试对其他被试的情感(善心)和认知(依赖)信任,而且能提升被试在信任游戏中对其他被试的信任行为;并且认同感在前者的关系中起中介作用。综合两个研究结果,契约参与度能提高对共同参与制定契约的同伴的信任,且社会认同能解释这种影响。 From the perspective of contract making process,this study explores the influence and mechanism of individual participation in contract making on interpersonal trust.The method of combining Quasi-Experimentation Design based Field Research with laboratory experiment is studied.The results of the field study show that participation in the development of dormitory contract can promote interpersonal trust and identity mediated the effect of contract involvement on interpersonal trust.The results of laboratory experiments showed that participation increased participants’trust behaviors towards other participants in the trust game,but recognition could not explain the effect.The sense of identity mediates the degree of engagement that affects the emotional(benevolent)and cognitive(dependent)trust of other subjects;The effect of contractual participation on the trust of strangers is not significant.Combined with the results of the two studies,contractual participation can increase the trust of partners who participate in the formation of the contract,and social identity can explain the impact.However,the increasing effect of contract participation on trust cannot be extended to stranger groups.
作者 马华维 韩景云 Ma Huawei;Han Jingyun(Department of Psychology,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387)
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第1期70-76,共7页 Psychological Exploration
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA165)
关键词 契约参与度 人际信任 社会认同感 contract involvement interpersonal trust social identity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献52

  • 1郑伯.企业组织中上下属的信任关系[J].社会学研究,1999(2):24-39. 被引量:170
  • 2席酉民,杜永怡,刘晖.组织成员对组织信任的影响因素及其作用关系研究[J].经济管理,2004,30(18):40-46. 被引量:8
  • 3周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3609
  • 4于海波,方俐洛,凌文辁,郑晓明.组织信任对员工态度和离职意向、组织财务绩效的影响[J].心理学报,2007,39(2):311-320. 被引量:45
  • 5Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, .1173-1182.
  • 6Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 27, 269-299.
  • 7Bless, H., & Fiedler, K. (2006). Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Affect in social cognition and behavior (pp. 65-84). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • 8Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic testof their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909-927.
  • 9Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. M Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations." Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 261-287). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • 10Cunningham, J.~B., & MacGregor, J. (2000). Trust and the design of work: Complementary constructs in satisfaction and performance. Human Relations, 53, 1575-1591.

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部