期刊文献+

公共管理视野下的证券投资者保护 被引量:10

On the Protection of Securities Investors in the Perspective of Public Administration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的证券投资者保护基于全能行政监管者和无限监管资源的假设,采用融资准入对投资者实行无差别保护,已难以适应资本市场的发展需求。从公共管理的角度看,应在整个证券投资过程中建立全民参与的投资者保护机制。其中,决策性的制度建设应分权给代表公共利益的行政监管者行使,确保其职能的独立和专业化;执行性的投资者保护工作应分权给一线的自律组织和金融中介承担,确保客户至上并避免利益冲突;保护主体应引入投资者的公共参与,引导其成为能动的自我保护者;公力救济要发挥行政执法的主导效用,兼顾其中的伦理性与经济性。以人人有权、人人有责的公共管理理念作为投资者保护的基点,《证券法》规范下的多层次资本市场才能具有稳固的民意基础,实现繁荣昌盛。 Traditionally,protection of securities investors is based on the hypothesis that the government can control and regulate everything and have unlimited power to supervise resources. Today the mode of regulating access to financing to protect investors indiscriminately has proved incapable of meeting the needs of capital market development. This paper argues that,from the perspective of public administration,it is necessary to set up a mechanism for protecting investors which entails participation on the part of all the people throughout the process of securities investment. Specifically,the power to make regulations regarding governing policies should be allocated to the administrators who represent the public interest in order to ensure a high level of independence and professionalism in their work; the executive work of investor protection should be allocated to situated organizations and financial agencies in order to ensure materialization of the golden rule of 'clients first'and avoid conflicts of interests. Besides,public participation of investors should be introduced into the mechanism of protection and investors should be educated to become good at self-protection. Public remedy should play a leading role in the administration enforcement apart from taking account of ethical and economic factors. It is suggested that the core of investor protection is the philosophy of public administration that'Everyone has the right and responsibility to themselves. 'Only by creating a multi-level capital market regulated by The Securities Act can we have a solid foundation of public opinion for sustainable prosperity.
作者 洪艳蓉
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期58-66,共9页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
关键词 公共管理 投资者保护 《证券法》 public administration,investor protection,The Securities Act
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献42

  • 1张帆,王晓冰,李箐,傅凯文.成败陈久霖[J].财经,2004,0(24):24-30. 被引量:8
  • 2洪艳蓉.中国资产证券化的制度竞争与协调[J].证券市场导报,2006(9):16-24. 被引量:23
  • 3The Joint Forum (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, International Organization of Securities Commissions, International Association of Insurance Supervisors, C/O Bank for International Settlements),Credit Risk Transfer, March 2005.
  • 4洪艳蓉.危机之辨:次贷证券化与金融监管[A].陈安.国际经济法学刊[M]:16(2),北京大学出版社.2009:2.
  • 5扈企平.结构化融资的八大要素[EB/OL].http://www.chmgov.cn/chinese/home/jsp/docView.jsp?docID=2331.2011-4.20.
  • 6《改革法》第941条.
  • 7http://www.trustee.org.cn/html/sjtj/4132.html.2011年5月10日最后访问.
  • 8Aruerican Securitization Forum, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association; Australian Securitization Forum and European Securifsation Forum, Restoring Confidence in the Securitization Markets, December 3 ,2008.
  • 9Erik F. Gerding, the Subprime Crisis and the Ontsourcing of Financial R:egulation to Financial Institution Risk Models: Code, crash, and Open Source, August 16, 2008, p.5, at http://ssrn.com/ abstract=1273467.
  • 10Faten Sabry and Chudozie Okongwu, Study of the Impact of Securitization On Consumers, Investors, Financial Institutions and the Capital Markets, American Securitizaition forum, June 19, 2009,.

共引文献105

引证文献10

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部