摘要
合理评价不同农地流转模式的实践效果对完善农地流转制度、有的放矢地推进农地流转具有重要意义.分别从经济、社会、环境3个方面选取10项指标,构建了农地流转综合绩效评价指标体系,并以成都郫县为研究区进行了实证.结果表明,综合绩效由大到小依次为:股份合作制模式(84.33),集体参与模式(37.37),农户自发模式(22.54);从单一绩效来看,股份制合作制模式最佳,集体参与模式的环境绩效最差,农户自发模式的社会绩效最差.研究认为,不同的农地流转模式因其适用条件不同,故各有其优缺点,因地制宜、规范有序、循序渐进、统筹兼顾是推进农地流转、获取绩效最大化的主要策略.
Proper evaluation of different farmland circulation modes is of great importance for improving farmland circulation system and executing farmland circulation policy .In a study reported in this paper ,10 indicators were selected from economic performance ,social performance and environmental performance of farmland circulation to establish an evaluation system for its comprehensive performance ,and an empirical study was made with Pixian County of Sichuan as the study area .The results showed that the stock coop‐erative mode gave the best comprehensive performance (84?33 ) ,followed in sequence by the collective participatory mode (37?37) and the farmers spontaneous mode (22?54) .However ,based on single per‐formance ,the stock cooperative mode was the best ,the collective participatory mode was the poorest in environmental performance ,and the farmers spontaneous mode was the poorest in social performance . Therefore ,each farmland circulation mode has its own strengths and weaknesses ,and in practice the spe‐cific conditions should be taken into consideration and the principles of “adjusting measures to local condi‐tions” ,“proceeding in a normative and orderly way and step by step” and “making overall plans and taking all factors into consideration” should be adhered to ,so as to promote the healthy development of farmland circulation and maximize its performance .
出处
《西南大学学报(自然科学版)》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第1期110-117,共8页
Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition)
基金
国家科技支撑计划课题"乡村土地流转与资源整合关键技术与示范"(2013BAJ11B02)
关键词
农地流转
绩效
评价体系
模式
郫县
farmland circulation
performance
evaluation system
mode
Pixian County