摘要
构建协同度测度模型对长三角和珠三角1202项创新政策展开量化评价与特征比较。研究发现:政策主体以主管科技资源和掌握行政和经济资源部门协同为主,协同深度不够理想;目标协同存在差异且与区域经济发展模式有关;需求导向措施严重缺位,长三角的需求型政策与环境型政策表现更为协同,环境型政策措施与政策目标的协同较好,而珠三角供给型政策和环境型政策协同度更高,需求导向型措施与政策目标的协同性优于长三角;两区域的措施协同、措施与目标协同整体呈上升趋势。
This paper establishing a synergy model conduct quantitative evaluation and comparison between the Delta’s 1202 innovation policies of the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River. Result shows that, policy subject mainly cooperate technological resource with administrative and economic resource departments while the depth of synergy is not ideal. Related to economic development pattern, objective synergy is different and demand measures are seriously absent. Demand and environmental policies in the Yangtze River Delta are more synergistic, and environmental measures with policy objectives are better. Supply and environmental policies in the Pearl River Delta are more collaborative, as well as demand measures and policy objectives. The synergy of measure and objective shows upward trend.
作者
樊霞
陈娅
贾建林
FAN Xia;CHEN Ya;JIA Jian-lin(School of Business Administration,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641)
出处
《软科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第3期70-74,105,共6页
Soft Science
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(71473086)
关键词
创新政策
政策主体
政策目标
政策措施
协同
innovation policy
policy subject
policy objective
policy measure
synergy