无张力疝修补术和常规修补术治疗股疝的临床价值比较

To compare the clinical value of tension-free hernia repair and routine repair in the treatment of femoral hernia

目的比较常规修补术与无张力疝修补术治疗股疝的临床效果。方法本次研究对象来源于我院2015年1月—2016年1月收治的股疝患者80例,随机分成两组,各40例,其中对照组治疗术式为常规修补术,观察组术式为腹膜前无张力疝修补术,比较两组手术效果。结果观察组并发症发生率为15.0%,明显低于对照组42.5%,比较有显著性差异(P<0.05);观察组复发率为2.5%,明显低于对照组17.5%,比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论相较于常规修补术,腹膜前无张力疝修补术治疗股疝临床价值更高,更值得推广。

Objective Objective To compare the clinical effect of conventional repair and tension-free hernia repair for femoral hernia. Methods Eighty patients with femoral hernia treated in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2016 were randomly divided into two groups: 40 cases. The control group was treated with routine repair. For the retroperitoneal tension-free hernia repair,compared the two groups of surgical effects. Results The incidence of complication in the observation group was 15. 0%,which was significantly lower than that in the control group( 42. 5%,P<0. 05). The relapse rate in the observation group was 2. 5%,which was significantly lower than that in the control group( 17. 5%,P<0. 05). Conclusion Compared with conventional repair,retroperitoneal tension-free hernia repair treatment of femoral hernia clinical value is higher,more worthy of promotion.