摘要
目的探讨针对产妇使用胎头吸引助产和低位产钳助产的临床效果。方法随机选取我院2016年4月至2017年4月产科收治的102名产妇为例,将其盲选分为对照组和观察组。观察组使用Simpson产钳展开低位助产,对照组采用硅胶喇叭形胎头吸引器展开助产,分娩成功后对比分析产妇的产后出血、软产道损伤概率,对胎儿的头颅血肿、颅内出血、窒息死亡情况也展开统计。结果对两组产妇的新生儿头颅血肿、颅内出血、窒息死亡的情况展开资料对比,发现其中新生儿头颅血肿、颅内出血、窒息情况P<0.05,差异具有显著意义;产妇在软产道严重损伤发生情况上、产后大出血发生情况以及产后新生儿死亡情况上P>0.05,差异不显著,不具有统计学意义。结论相对胎头吸引助产,低位产钳助产在降低新生儿头颅血肿、颅内出血、窒息的几率上更低,临床具有推广价值。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of maternal use of forceps midwifery and low forceps. Methods 102 parturients from our hospital from April 2016 to April 2017 were randomly selected as an example,and the blind selection was divided into the control group and the observation group. The observation group using Simpson low expansion forceps midwifery,the control group using silica gel horn extractor for fetal head start midwifery,soft birth canal injury probability of maternal postpartum hemorrhage,comparative analysis after a successful delivery,the fetal cranial hematoma,intracranial hemorrhage,asphyxia death also statistics. Results two groups of maternal neonatal cranial hematoma,intracranial hemorrhage,asphyxia cases data comparison,found that neonatal cranial hematoma,intracranial hemorrhage,asphyxia P<0. 05,the difference was significant; maternal soft birth canal injury in severe cases,the incidence of postpartum postpartum and neonatal death cases of P bleeding. 0. 05,no significant difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion the relative forceps midwifery,low forceps in reducing neonatal cranial hematoma,intracranial hemorrhage,asphyxia rate lower,has clinical popularization value.
