微创引流术与开颅术式应用于脑外伤硬脑膜外血肿患者治疗中的效果分析

Effect of minimally invasive drainage and craniotomy in the treatment of patients with traumatic brain injury

目的分析微创引流术与开颅术式应用于脑外伤硬脑膜外血肿患者治疗中的效果。方法选取我院2016年1月-12月收治的82例脑外伤硬脑膜外血肿患者作为研究对象,根据不同治疗方式将其分为研究组(41例)与对照组(41例)。对照组行传统开颅术治疗,研究组行微创引流术治疗;比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院费用、住院时间与并发症发生率。结果与对照组比较,研究组的手术时间、术中出血量、住院费用、住院时间与并发症发生率更优,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论微创引流术应用于脑外伤硬脑膜外血肿患者治疗中的效果优于开颅术式,值得在临床治疗工作中推广运用。

Objective to analyze the effect of minimally invasive drainage and craniotomy in the treatment of traumatic epidural hematoma. Methods 82 cases of traumatic epidural hematoma in our hospital from January 2016 to-12 were selected as the research object,according to different treatment methods,they were divided into study group( n = 41) and control group( n = 41). The control group was treated with traditional craniotomy,and the study group received minimally invasive drainage. The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,hospitalization costs,hospital stay and complications were compared between the two groups. Results compared with the control group,the operation time,intraoperative blood loss,hospitalization expenses,hospitalization time and complication rate were better,the difference was statistically significant( P< 0. 05). Conclusion the application of minimally invasive drainage in the treatment of traumatic brain injury patients with epidural hematoma is better than craniotomy,which is worthy of popularization and application in clinical treatment.