梗死前心绞痛患者的临床急诊效果观察

Observation of clinical emergency effect in patients with pre infarction angina

目的分析梗死前心绞痛患者接受不同临床急诊治疗方式的具体效果。方法选取我院在2016年10月至2017年9月间收治的梗死前心绞痛患者共88例作为此次研究的重点对象,依照患者的入院顺序合理划分为对照组及研究组,对比分析对照组患者在接受了常规治疗方案后与研究组患者接受了抗凝、解痉及扩冠后的治疗效果,明确两组患者的临床效果差异。结果研究组中,患者在接受常规治疗方案的基础上实施了抗凝、解痉及扩冠等举措,在心肌梗死、心律失常、心力衰竭的发生概率等方面相较于对照组患者来说更低,两组之间的差异明显,存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者的总发病率低于对照组的患者,两组之间呈现出的差异显著,体现出统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论梗死前心绞痛患者在接受了常规治疗方案的基础上,实施抗凝、解痉及扩冠等举措可保证治疗效果更显著,能够降低患者心肌梗死及心律失常等疾病的发生概率,是值得推广的治疗方案。

Objective To analyze the effect of different clinical emergency treatment in patients with preinfarction angina pectoris. Methods A total of 88 patients with preinfarction angina pectoris admitted from October 2016 to September 2017 in our hospital were selected as the focus of this study. According to the order of admission,the patients were divided into control group and study group. The control group and the study group received anticoagulant,antispasmolysis and crown expansion after receiving routine treatment. Results in the study group,the patients were treated with anticoagulant,antispasmodic and dilatation on the basis of routine treatment. Coronary and other measures in myocardial infarction,arrhythmia,heart failure and other aspects of the incidence of lower than the control group,the difference between the two groups is obvious. There was statistical significance( P < 0. 05). The total incidence of patients in the study group was lower than that in the control group,and there was a significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion patients with pre-infarction angina pectoris received routine treatment on the basis of anticoagulant anticoagulant antispasmolysis and coronary expansion can ensure the treatment effect is more significant. It can reduce the incidence probability of myocardial infarction and arrhythmia,which is worth popularizing.