摘要
根据刑事诉讼法规定,律师取得了在侦查阶段的介入权,确立了在侦查阶段的诉讼地位,为维护犯罪嫌疑人的合法权益起到了一定的作用,但刑事诉讼法对律师在侦查阶段的介入权规定的权限非常小,致使与国外律师在侦查阶段的介入权限相比有很大差异,进行中西比较可以给我们以启示。
As stipulated in criminal proceedings code,the attorney obtains the right to intervene during the investigation period and then establishes his proceedings position.This is helpful to defend the legitimate interests of the criminal suspects,but the attorney's right to intervene during the investigation period is limited in criminal proceedings code.Being compared with external attorney's right to intervene during the investigation period,there are more different from them.We will get indications from comparison between China and West countries.
出处
《山西经济管理干部学院学报》
2003年第4期68-69,共2页
Journal of Shanxi Institute of Economic Management