老年病人静脉留置输液两种封管方法的比较

The comparative study on methods of blocking tube of vein retention transfusion in the elderly patient

目的:对比老年病人静脉留置输液无针密闭输液接头(Claveconnector译名可来福接头)与肝素钠溶液封管对留置时间的影响。方法:实验组输液完毕采用生理盐水冲管,可来福接头封管;对照组采用肝素钠溶液(50u/ml,4～6ml),每6～10h封管一次。结果:可来福组平均留置时间3.6天,对照组平均留置时间4.6天,两组比较0.01<P<0.02。结论:老年病人静脉留置输液采用生理盐水冲管、可来福接头封管,平均留置时间短于肝素钠溶液封管组,老年病人不提倡单纯使用可来福接头封管。

Objective To compare the influence of vein retention transfusion time with the needleless closed connector or heparin to block the tube in the elderly patient. Methods The Clave connector group adopts physiological saline to wash the tube firstly and then block the tube with the Clave connector, and the contrast group adopts the heparin (50 u/ ml, 4～ 6 ml), block the tube per 6～ 10 hours. Result The retention time of the Clave connector group is 3.6 days on the average, and the contrast group is 4.6 days, the comparison of two groups is more different significant(0.01< P <0.02).Conclusion The average retention time of the Clave connector group is shorter than that in contrast group for the elderly patient it is not promoted to block the tube with the Clave connector solely.