期刊文献+

中国的经济增长、贫困减少与政策选择 被引量:339

Economic Growth,Income Inequity,and Poverty Reduction in the China
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文详细讨论了贫困分析常用的几个概念和衡量指标 ,并建立了它们之间的关系 ,从而建立起分析模型。进一步 ,本文提出了分解增长效应的方法和贫困减少指数 ,然后 ,本文将提出的模型、方法和指数应用于调查结果及其他官方资料 ,以分析 1 985年至 2 0 0 1年间增长与贫困减少的关系。实证结果与 1 985年以来中国贫困减少的经历相符。贫困减少指数表明 ,增长政策的选择应该使收入效应与不均等效应之和最大化 ,这为不同的发展阶段与不同的地区提供了政策选择。 The paper utilizes several common used definitions in poverty measurement and establishes their relationships and applications to develop a model for poverty analysis. The paper further develops the methodology of decomposition of growth effect and proposes a poverty reduction index. The model was applied to the survey and other official data to analyze the rural poverty reduction in the PRC from 1985 to 2001. The empirical results produced by the model are consistent with the PRC's poverty reduction experience since 1985. The poverty reduction index implies that the selection of growth policies should be to maximize the sum of income and inequality effect. This offers the choices of growth policies for different development stages and different regions.
作者 林伯强
机构地区 亚洲开发银行
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第12期15-25,共11页 Economic Research Journal
关键词 中国 经济增长 政策选择 贫困人口 平均收入 Poverty Reduction Index Gini Coefficient Lorenz Curve Poverty Decomposition of Growth Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Ahluwalia, M. S., 1974, "Income inequality: Some Dimension of the Problem", in Chenery, H. et al. (eds.), Redistribution with Growth, Oxford University Press.
  • 2Clark, S. R., Hemming, R., and Ulph, D., 1980, "On Indices for Poverty Measurement", Economic Journal.
  • 3Dollar D., and Kraay A., 2001, "Growth is Good for the Poor", Mimeo, World Bank, Washington D.C., Policy Research Working Papers, 2587, 11-19.
  • 4Fields, G., 1988, "Changes in Poverty and Inequality in the Developing Countries", Comell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • 5Foster, James E., J. Greer, and Thorbecke, 1984, "A Case of Decomposable Poverty Measures", Econometrica, 52: 761-765.
  • 6Jain L., Tandulkar S., 1990, "Role of Growth and Distribution in the Observed Change of the Headeount Ratio Measure of Poverty for Rural and Urban Population of India 1970-71 to 1983", Journal of Indian School of Political Economy, 1.
  • 7Kakwani, Nanak C., 1980, "Income Inequality and Poverty Methods of Estimation and Policy Applications". Oxford University Press.
  • 8Kakwani N., Subbarao K., 1990, "Rural Poverty and Its Alleviation in India", Economic and Political Weekly, March 31.
  • 9Knight, J., and Song, Lina, 2001, "Economic Growth, Economic Reform, and Rising Inequality in China", in Riskin, Zhao, and Li, ed. China's Retreat From Inequality: Income Distribution and Economic Transition, New York: M. E. Sharpe, 84-122.
  • 10Li Shi, 2001, "Research on China Individual Income Distribution: Historical Review and Future Development", United Forum, Beijing.

同被引文献3449

引证文献339

二级引证文献5186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部