摘要
目的应用离体牙研究比较Er,Cr∶YSGG激光备洞与牙钻备洞对树脂充填微渗漏的影响。方法将30颗离体牙随机分为3组制备Ⅴ类洞:牙钻预备加酸蚀处理(对照组)、单纯激光预备组、激光预备加酸蚀处理组,每组10颗牙,经冷热循环染色后,在体视显微镜下记录微渗漏程度并应用非参数统计方法分析数据。结果在冠侧洞缘,激光预备加酸蚀处理组微渗漏与对照组差异无显著意义,单纯激光预备组微渗漏较对照组严重(P<0.05);在牙龈侧洞缘,单纯激光预备组充填体边缘微渗漏情况与对照组差异无显著意义,而激光预备加酸蚀组的充填体边缘微渗漏比对照组显著减少(P<0.01)。结论用Er,Cr∶YSGG激光预备Ⅴ类洞不能增加树脂与牙体组织的结合减少微渗漏的发生;而应用激光同时行酸蚀处理可以增强树脂充填体与牙本质间的结合,减少牙龈侧洞缘微渗漏。
Objective To compare the microleakage after composite resin filling to class Ⅴ cavities prepared by Er,Cr∶YSGG laser versus conventional mechanical treatment in vitro. Methods Thirty healthy human third molars were randomly assigned to three equal groups (n=10). Group 1: class Ⅴ cavities were prepared with a high-speed diamond bur and treated with 15% phosphoric acid. Group 2: cavities were prepared by the Er,Cr∶YSGG laser with water cooling. Group 3: cavities were prepared by laser and then acid etched by 15% phosphoric acid. Prime & BondR NT Adhesive System and X-FlowTM flowable resin composite were used for restorations. All samples were thermocycled and stained in 0.1% methylene blue, dye penetration was scored by means of a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using non-parametric statistical tests (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney). Results On the occlusal margins, microleakage in acid etched cavities (group 1) was significantly lower than that achieved after laser treatment (group 2)(P<0.05); no statistical difference between groups 1 and 3. On the gingival margins, microleakage in group 3 was significantly lower than that in group 1(P<0.01); no statistical difference between groups 2 and 3. Conclusions Er,Cr∶YSGG Laser irradiation of enamel and dentin is not a valid alternative to acid-etching pretreatment for resin composite material adhesion. The use of acid etching in conjunction with laser cavity preparation decreases the microleakage in resin filling in dentin surfaces.
出处
《中国激光医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2003年第4期229-231,共3页
Chinese Journal of Laser Medicine & Surgery