期刊文献+

内隐人格理论的实体论-渐变论维度研究述评 被引量:32

A Review on the Research in the dimension of Entity Theory versus Incremental Theory of Implicit Personality Theories
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对内隐人格理论的实体论-渐变论维度的研究是近年来社会认知研究的一个新趋势。研究发现,人们对人的特性(如智力、品德和人格特征等)的内隐认知理论,制约调节着他们对人的行为的理解和反应。人们持有的不同内隐人格理论导致他们不同的社会认知模式和行为反应方式。实体论者由于认为人的特性是固定不变的,而倾向于用抽象概括化的和静态的内在特质来理解人的行为;而渐变论者由于认为人的特性是动态可塑的,而倾向于用影响心理动态过程的内外具体调节因素来理解人的行为。作者在综述有关研究的基础上,进而提出一些新的见解。 The Research in the dimension of entity theory versus incremental theory of implicit personality theories is a new trend in social cognition. Its found that people's implicit personality theories about human attributes structure the way they understand and react to human behavior. Different implicit personality theories cause different social cognitive patterns and different reactions. Research is reviewed showing that entity theorists believe that attributes are fixed, therefore they tend to understand behavior in terms of these abstract and static internal traits. In contrast, incremental theorists believe that attributes are more dynamic, therefore they tend to understand behavior in terms of more specific behavioral or psychological mediators. On the base of the review on relevant research, the authors give some new viewpoints.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2003年第2期153-159,共7页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 中国科学院生命科学与生物技术领域青年科学家小组资助和科技部资助(G1998030508)。
关键词 社会认知 内隐人格理论 实体论 渐变论 心理模型 实体论者 渐变论者 差异 Implicit Personality Theories, entity theory, incremental theory, mental model.
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1[1]Dweck C S, Chiu Hong. Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reaction: a world from two perspectives, Psychological Inquiry, 1995, 6: 267~285
  • 2[2]Levy S R , Plaks J E, Dweck C S. Modes of social thought: Implicit theories and social understanding. In: Chaiken S, Trope Y, ed. Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology. NY: Guilford Press, 1999. 179~202
  • 3[3]Mueller C, Dweck C S. Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75: 33~52
  • 4[4]Shoda Y, Michel W. Cognitive social approach to dispositional inferences: What if the perceiver is a cognitive social theorist? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1993, 19: 574~585
  • 5[5]Chiu Hong, Dweck C S. lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 73: 19~30
  • 6[6]Levy S R., Dweck C S. trait vs. process-centered social judgment. Social cognition, 1998, 16: 151~172
  • 7[7]Dweck C S. Self-theory: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia, PA, US: Psychology Press, 1999
  • 8[8]Dweck C S, Chiu, Hong. Implicit theories: elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 1995, 6: 322 ~333
  • 9[9]Norenzayan A, Choi I, Nisbett R E. Eastern and Western perceptions of causality for social behavior: Lay theories about personalities and situations. In: Prentice D A, Miller D T ed. Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict. New York, NY, US: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999. 239~272
  • 10[10]Nisbett R E, Peng C I, Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 2001, 108(2): 291~310

同被引文献501

引证文献32

二级引证文献180

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部