历史唯物主义,还是历史唯心主义?——关于分析改革问题的基本出发点的分歧

Historical Materialism or Historical Idealism —— On Disagreement in Analyzing Basic Starting Point in Reform

围绕改革问题,存在诸多有争议的观点,然而,归根结底其认识论的根源是不同世界观、方法论的问题。如果坚持历史唯物主义,从分析客观存在的矛盾出发,就能正确认识改革的必要性、改革的性质和对象,从而得出“改革是社会主义制度的自我完善,改革的对象不是社会主义生产关系,而是其中不适应生产力发展要求的方面”的正确结论。如果从“人的本性是自私的”这一历史唯心主义命题出发来分析改革,则必然得出“实行私有化,走资本主义道路”的错误结论。

There are controversial ideas about the question of reform,but its root in epistemology really lies in different world outlook and methodology.If we insist on historical materialism and start from the analysis of contradictions that objectively exist,we can understand correctly the nature,object and necessity of reform and arrive at the correct conclusion that reform is the self-perfection of socialist system and that the object of reform is not socialist production relations but the aspect not suitable to the demand of development of production forces.If we start from the proposition of historical idealism that human nature is selfish,then we will definitely arrive at the wron conclusion that we should institute privatization and take the road of capitalism.