期刊文献+

三仙姑和曹七巧比较质疑 被引量:2

Suspection on the Comparision of SAN Xian-gu and CAO Qi-qiao
下载PDF
导出
摘要 三仙姑和曹七巧不是完全同类人物 ,不能认为赵树理丑化了三仙姑 ,张爱玲却创造了与祥林嫂并列的不朽的艺术典型。实际上 ,三仙姑是一个符合生活真实 ,具有一定典型性的形象 ,赵树理对她进行讽刺批评并写出她的思想发展是无可指责的。而曹七巧只是一个只有变态心理和变态行为而缺乏真实个性的人物 ,她的极端和复杂不是从生活中来 ,而是张爱玲主观编造的 ,张爱玲在对曹七巧的描写中无形地流露了她的贵族心理 。 The thesis doesn't consent of the view that SAN Xian gu and Cao Qi qiao are the characters,and doesn't view that ZHAO Shu li uglifis the former but ZHANG Ai ling create the immortal artical character compared with XiangLin Sao,too.On the contrary,the main idea is that SAN Xian gu is considered a classic figure with the accordance to the realistic life and that there is a justification for Zhao to ironic her and portrate the trace of her thought.At the same time,it criticises that CAO Qi qiao is a false figure with abnormal mental and actions,whose utmost and complexity is invented by the subjectivity of the author but comes from the livelihood,and that the noble mental and psychical clouds of Zhang's are expressed on the portray of CAO Qi qiao unconsciouly.
作者 陈钟
出处 《湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2003年第2期73-77,共5页 Journal of Hubei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science)
关键词 三仙姑 曹七巧 比较 质疑 赵树理 张爱玲 贵族心理 文学形象 SAN Xian gu CAO Qi qiao comparision suspection
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

共引文献3

同被引文献4

  • 1Henk de Berg.被误读百年的弗洛伊德[M].季广茂,译.北京:金城出版社,2010.
  • 2赵树理.赵树理全集[M].太原:北岳文艺出版社,1999:152-169.
  • 3张爱玲.张爱玲文集:第二卷[M].合肥:安徽文艺出版社,2006:85-124.
  • 4白福才.《金锁记》人物曹七巧形象浅析[J].广西社会科学,2003(11):123-124. 被引量:1

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部