期刊文献+

仰韶文化渊源研究检视 被引量:11

A Review of Researches on the Origin of the Yangshao Culture
原文传递
导出
摘要 The origin of the Yangshao culture has been studied for eighty years, but neither Western scholars' theory of western diffusion nor Chinese scholars' indigenous and pluralistic concepts have solved this problem. The theory of western diffusion believes that the Yangshao culture was concerned with cultural spread from abroad. It is based upon the hypothesis that the techniques of painted pottery originated in the Middle East. The indigenous concept has significance only for denying the theory of western diffusion but has not solved the essential problem. The pluralistic notion is the concretization of the indigenous concept. It holds that a number of cultural sources, such as the Laoguantai, Lijiacun, Cishan and Peiligang cultures, gave birth to the Yangshao culture that varied in different regions. Actually it takes the Yangshao as an entity varying not only in source but also in stream. The most realistic is the multi-stream theory, which identifies the main stream and then clarifies other sources and streams as well as their relationship. It believes that the Shanxi and Henan Yangshao differs from the Guanzhong Yangshao in origination and that its source must have been the Peiligang culture or other contemporary cultures. The Yangshao culture in the Guanzhong region and its vicinity must have originated in the Baijiacun (Laoguantai/Dadiwan) culture in the broad sense. The most direct source of the Yangshao culture was at the beginning believed to be the Lower Beishouling culture, and then to be the Lingkou culture. So far, no true answer has been found to the problem of the Yangshao's origin. The origin of the Yangshao culture has been studied for eighty years, but neither Western scholars' theory of western diffusion nor Chinese scholars' indigenous and pluralistic concepts have solved this problem. The theory of western diffusion believes that the Yangshao culture was concerned with cultural spread from abroad. It is based upon the hypothesis that the techniques of painted pottery originated in the Middle East. The indigenous concept has significance only for denying the theory of western diffusion but has not solved the essential problem. The pluralistic notion is the con-cretization of the indigenous concept. It holds that a number of cultural sources, such as the Laoguantai, Lijiacun, Cishan and Peiligang cultures, gave birth to the Yangshao culture that varied in different regions. Actually it takes the Yangshao as an entity varying not only in source but also in stream. The most realistic is the multi-stream theory, which identifies the main stream and then clarifies other sources and streams as well as their relationship. It believes that the Shanxi and Henan Yangshao differs from the Guanzhong Yangshao in origination and that its source must have been the Peiligang culture or other contemporary cultures. The Yangshao culture in the Guanzhong region and its vicinity must have originated in the Baijiacun (Laoguantai/ Dadiwan) culture in the broad sense. The most direct source of the Yangshao culture was at the beginning believed to be the Lower Beishouling culture, and then to be the Lingkou culture. So far, no true answer has been found to the problem of the Yangshao's origin.
作者 王仁湘
出处 《考古》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第6期70-82,共13页 Archaeology
关键词 仰韶文化 起源 新石器文化 前半坡文化 绳纹 Yangshao culture origin theory of western diffusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

二级参考文献120

共引文献698

同被引文献150

引证文献11

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部