摘要
Generally, it may be possible to say that one thinker is still ‘immature’ in his thought at a certain stage. However, what is important is how to closely grasp uniqueness of his mentality or ideological growing point which dominates one’s life from‘immature’to‘mature’development. The exceptional growing point of one’s idea intrinsically determines how to select, abandon or adopt resources that history provides by the thinker. Based on this, whatsoever deep influence on him by his predecessors or the contemporaries successively, he will never spiritually become a slave of any thinker whom he holds in esteem because of his ‘immaturity ’in some stage From ‘immature’to‘mature’ ideological growth, Marx always held belief that each ‘real and living individual’ should win freedom matching his ‘individuality’, and, meanwhile, endowed to his philosophy an invariable morality that philosophy should shoulder its practical and critical responsibility in transmuting the reality. In this process, never did happen vicissitude of his original spiritual state regarded as growing point of his idea. Therefore, there never exists Marx’s essential ‘turn’ or ‘rupture’ in the orientation of value and in his logic of thinking.
Generally, it may be possible to say that one thinker is still ‘immature’ in his thought at a certain stage. However, what is important is how to closely grasp uniqueness of his mentality or ideological growing point which dominates one’s life from‘immature’to‘mature’development. The exceptional growing point of one’s idea intrinsically determines how to select, abandon or adopt resources that history provides by the thinker. Based on this, whatsoever deep influence on him by his predecessors or the contemporaries successively, he will never spiritually become a slave of any thinker whom he holds in esteem because of his ‘immaturity ’in some stage From ‘immature’to‘mature’ ideological growth, Marx always held belief that each ‘real and living individual’ should win freedom matching his ‘individuality’, and, meanwhile, endowed to his philosophy an invariable morality that philosophy should shoulder its practical and critical responsibility in transmuting the reality. In this process, never did happen vicissitude of his original spiritual state regarded as growing point of his idea. Therefore, there never exists Marx’s essential ‘turn’ or ‘rupture’ in the orientation of value and in his logic of thinking.
出处
《哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第7期3-12,共10页
Philosophical Research
