摘要
辩诉交易制度是一种十分“奇怪而有趣”的刑事司法制度,非常类似于民事诉讼中的和解制度。百余年来,这一制度相继为一些国家所奉行,解决了几近90%以上的刑事案件。但由于它常常以“出卖正义”的形式来换取效率,因而也遭致了公众极大非议。尽管如此,这一“经常产生某些争议的惯例”至今仍在一些国家盛行不衰,它“不仅极大地减轻了公诉人的负担,而且对于被指控者来说也是十分有利的”。本文认为,这一制度的产生不仅有其深刻的历史背景、历史必然性和合理的成份,而且从现实的运行效果来看,也是相当明显的。因此,若能剔除其糟粕,吸取其精华,则是完全可以借用来为我国的刑事司法制度与实践服务的。
Plea bargaining system is a kind of very 'surprising and fascinating' Criminal judicial system, and the system is extremely analogous to reconcilatory system in the civil action, since over a hundred years, it is pursued by some countries one after another, successively resolving nearly ninety percent criminal cases. Owing to frequently 'exchanging justice for efficiency', as a result it results in the public's strong criticism. However, In spite of these criticisms, this kind of 'Constantly bringing about some countroversial conventions' are in vogue and don't wane in some Countries, this practice 'not only greatly ease the load of public prosecutors, but also is very beneficial to the accused.' My thesis believes that this kind of system has obvious effect as well as profound history background > necessity and reasonable elements. Hence, getting rid of its dross and sucking up its essence may completely let it serve for criminal judicial system of our country.
出处
《湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第4期51-58,共8页
Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Science)