摘要
定罪乃判定某一危害行为构成犯罪与否的认识活动,应当合乎认识论的基本原理;在这一认识活动中,危害行为是认识的客体,犯罪构成是认识的中介。传统犯罪构成理论将危害行为视为犯罪构成客观要件之一,混淆了认识客体和认识中介之间的界限。期待可能性成为犯罪构成主观要件之一具有理论和实践的根据;犯罪目的是希望意志的核心,不是独立的主观要件;犯罪动机是独立于罪过心理而存在的选择性主观要件。犯罪主体要件、客观要件和主观要件形成了犯罪构成系统的基本构架。
The conviction, as an activity of cognition, is to judge whether a certain dangerous act constitute an offence or not. So this activity should conform to the fundamental principles of theory of cognition. The dangerous act is the object of cognition while the constitution of crime is the intermediate of cognition. The traditional viewpoints of the theory of criminal constitution that the dangerous act is one of the objective elements confuse the object of cognition with the intermediate of cognition. The criminal purpose is not the subjective element, because it is the nucleus of the aspiration. The criminal motive is the chosen subjective element and is independent of the offense mind. The subject, the objective aspects and subjective aspects of crime constitute the basic structure of criminal constitution.
出处
《法律科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第4期73-80,共8页
Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law)
