期刊文献+

中国的周边外交:困境与出路——以中缅关系为例 被引量:5

China's Foreign Policy towards Its Neighboring Countries: Problems and Solutions——Case Study of China-Myanmar Relations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国国力的增强并没有使中国的周边外交有明显的改善,当前中国与周边国家的关系存在三个主要问题:经济与安全分裂、传统安全与非传统安全分裂、制度化水平低。中国周边外交中存在的问题既与我国的外交结构有关,也与冷战后国际关系的格局有关。本文认为,中国外交中存在的一元主体对多元主体问题和美国对国际合法性的掌握是导致中国周边困境的原因。"一带一路"倡议的提出为我们主动建构中国的周边外交和周边秩序提供了平台。在"一带一路"的构建过程中,成员国资格、议题选择、行为主体确定等因素都应为解决中国的周边困境提供助力。 the economic development of China does not bring improvement for its relations with neighboring countries. There are there problems existed in China's relations with neighboring countries: asynchronism between economic relations and security relations,asynchronism between traditional security relations and non traditional security relations,low institutionalization. The causes lead to those problems are related with China's foreign policy and power structure of post cold war world. To be specific,this paper finds out that there is only one actor in China's diplomacy to cope with multi actor of foreign countries and US's control of international legitimacy are two reasons. Silk Road Proposal provides a platform for construct international order and improves its relations with neighboring countries; the candidacy,agenda settings and actors to be involved in Silk Road Proposal should be considered in the sake of solving problems existed between China and its neighboring countries.
作者 曹云华 刘鹏
出处 《印度洋经济体研究》 2015年第2期4-19,140,共17页 Indian Ocean Economic and Political Review
基金 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目"海外排华 反华的演变及其应对"(项目编号:13JJD810003) 2013年度国家社科基金青年项目"印度智库与印度对华外交政策研究"(项目编号:13CGJ014)的阶段研究成果
关键词 周边外交 国际合法性 一带一路 Neighboring Countries International Legitimacy Silk Road Proposal
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献66

  • 1刘登伟,李戈.国际河流开发和管理发展趋势[J].水利发展研究,2010,10(5):69-74. 被引量:7
  • 2[英]安德鲁·海伍德著,吴勇译.《政治学核心概念》,天津:天津人民出版社,2008年版,第275-276页.
  • 3Martin Griffiths, Terry O' Callaghan and Steven C. Roach, International Relations: KeyConcepts, London: Routledge, 2008, pp. 271-273.
  • 4Yong Deng, "Better Than Power: 'Intematlonal Status' in Chinese Foreign Policy," in Alastair lain Johnson, and Robert S. Ross, eds., New Direction in the Study of China's Foreign Policy, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006, pp. 51-67.
  • 5Yong Deng, C.hina's Struggle for Status: The Realignment of International Relations, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 3-8.
  • 6Peter J. Ahrensdorf, "The Fear of Death and the Longing for Immortality: Hobbes and Thucydides on Human Nature and the Problem of Anarchy," American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 3, 2000, pp. 579-593.
  • 7Mex Mintz, "How Do Leaders Make Decisions? A Poliheuristic Perspective," The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 48, No.l, 2004, pp. 3-13.
  • 8James D. Fearon, "Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes," The American Political Science Review, Vol. 88, No. 3, 1994, pp.577-592.
  • 9Paul K. Huth and Todd L. Allee, "Domestic Political Accountability and the Escalation and Settlement of International Disputes, " The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 46, No. 6, 2002, pp. 754-790.
  • 10Michael Tomz, "Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach," lnternational Organization, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2007, pp. 821-840.

同被引文献98

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部