期刊文献+

从中立到介入:澳大利亚南海立场的转变 被引量:3

From Neutral to Involve: The Change of Australia's South China Sea Policy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2012年前后,澳大利亚在南海所持立场发生了明显转变,由客观中立转向积极介入,不仅是在政治方面介入,甚至还在军事层面介入。中国在南海坚决维权、美国高调介入、澳大利亚寻求拓展外交空间、中澳自贸协定的签署等因素导致了澳大利亚立场的转变。澳大利亚在南海存在重要利益,其对南海并无战略野心;中澳都关心南海的自由通航,都不愿意南海走向军事冲突,两国之间的战略猜疑可以通过相互沟通、增大外交透明度、战略对接予以解决。虽然澳大利亚未来会加大对南海的介入程度,但无论是战略目标还是战略手段都将是有限的,中国不必感到过分担忧。 The policy of Australia's South China Sea has changed dramatically before and after 2012.It changed from neutral to involvement both in political and military affairs.The sign of Sino-Australia FTA,thehigh-profileinvolvement of America,thedesire to expand foreign influence,andthe determination of China's action in South China sea led to this change of policy.Australia has important interest in South China Sea and it has no strategic ambition in South China Sea.The difference between China and Australia can be resolved by communication and mutual trust.Although Australia will involve more in South China Sea issue,China should not be too sensitive to it for its strategic involvement will be limited in both goal and measure.
作者 许善品 赵昌
出处 《印度洋经济体研究》 2017年第3期23-42,137,共21页 Indian Ocean Economic and Political Review
基金 2015年澳大利亚印度洋战略的动因 内涵与中国的应对研究(湖南省社科一般项目 项目编号15YBA342)
关键词 澳大利亚 南海 中立 介入 Australia South China Sea Neutral Involvement
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献47

  • 1沈世顺.澳大利亚外交新走向[J].国际问题研究,2006(2):27-30. 被引量:5
  • 2张露,黄楫.中国周边战略中的澳大利亚——“大周边”战略理念与外交谋划的新探索[J].现代国际关系,2007(2):40-46. 被引量:5
  • 3Daniel Fhtton, "Spratly Spat Threatens to Overshadow Summit", The Sydney Morning Herald, July 22, 2011.
  • 4ASEAN Secretariat, "Top Ten ASEAN Trade Partner Countries/Regions ( 2009 )", http: //www. asean.org/stat/Table20. pdf.
  • 5中华人民共和国商务部综合司、国际贸易经济合作研究院.《中国对外贸易形势报告(2011年春季)》,http://zhs.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/cbw/201104/20110407511679.html,2011年4月22日.
  • 6Carl Ungerer, "Ian Storey and Sam Bateman, Making Mischief: the Return of the South China Sea Dispute", Special Report of Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Issue 36, December 2010, p. 2.
  • 7United States Institute of Peace, The South China Sea Dispute : Prospects for Preventive Diplomacy, http : //www. usip. org/files/resources/SR18. pdf.
  • 8Department of Defence ( Australia), Defending Australia in the Asia Pacific Century: Force 2030, http: //www. defence. gov. au/whitepaper/docs/defence _ white _ paper _ 2009. pdf, p. 12.
  • 9Carl Ungerer, "The ' Middle Power' Concept in Australian Foreign Policy", Australian Journal of Politics and History, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2007.
  • 10ASEAN Secretariat, "Overview of ASEAN-Australia Dialogue Relations ", http: //www. asean. org/23213. htm, October 2011.

共引文献32

同被引文献67

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部