期刊文献+

“港独”思潮的演化趋势与法理应对 被引量:5

The Evolutionary Trend and Legal Response to the Thought of “Hong Kong Independence”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来极少数"港独"分子正在积极建构其理论体系,试图从法理上证成"港独"的合理性。"港独"理论呈现三种演变趋势,即从民主回归到民族自决、从香港城邦到革新保港、从文化本土到政治本土。"港独"分子试图曲解国际条约中有关"民族自决权"的条款,为"港独"寻求国际法基础和国外势力支持。事实上,由于香港居民无法构成独立民族,并且香港也并非联合国认可的殖民地或非自治领土,因而"民族自决权"无法适用于香港特区。反击"法理港独"需要遵循法治的方式,判定"港独"不属于言论自由的范畴。中央政府可以通过宪法在特区的实施、总结基本法解释的原则和技术、落实中央权力在香港常态化运行等方式,增强香港居民的国家认同意识,树立中央政府的政治权威,从根本上遏制"港独"势力。 In recent years,the advocates of'Hong Kong independence'attempt actively to construct their theoretical system,which describe the Hong Kong SAR as an independent nation,and therefore justify the legitimacy of Hong Kong independence.Localism and self-determination are the core conceptions of their theoretical system.The evolutionary trends of'Hong Kong independence'appear in three ways:from democratic reunification to national self-determination; from the theory of city-state to'reform and preservation of Hong Kong'; from cultural localism to political localism.Meanwhile,the advocates of'Hong Kong independence'try to misinterpret the provisions of the international treaties on'national self-determination'and seek the support from foreign forces for'Hong Kong independence'to prove the validity of their independence demands.As a matter of fact,the Hong Kong residents cannot constitute an independent nation,and the Hong Kong SAR is not the colony or non-selfgoverning territory recognized by the United Nations.Therefore,the'right of national self-determination'does not apply to Hong Kong SAR.In practice,the speech of'Hong Kong independence'does not belong to the scope of freedom of speech.The central government could enhance the national identity of Hong Kong residents and curb the'Hong Kong independence'forces fundamentally through im-plementing the Constitution in Hong Kong,summarizing the principles and techniques in the interpretation of Hong Kong Basic Law,and exercising the powers of the central government in Hong Kong.
作者 王理万
出处 《港澳研究》 2017年第1期13-25,93-94,共15页 Hong Kong and Macao Journal
关键词 港独 民族自决 国家认同 本土意识 分离主义 一国两制 Hong Kong independence national self-determination national identity localism separatism One country Two systems
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献24

  • 1M.B.克留科夫,贺国安,蔡曼华.重读列宁——一位民族学者关于当代民族问题的思考[J].世界民族,1988(5):1-9. 被引量:9
  • 2王缉思.民族与民族主义[J].欧洲研究,1993,14(5):14-19. 被引量:79
  • 3列宁选集[C].人民出版社,1995(4):200.
  • 4[美]菲利克斯·格罗斯著,王建娥,魏强译.公民与国家[M].北京:新华出版社,2003(3):83-8583,86-87,9,3-4.
  • 5Louis L.Snyder,The New Nationalism,Ithaca,N.Y. :Cornell University Press, 1968,47.
  • 6Alfred Cobbon,The Nation State and National Self-determinaion, Thomas-Crowell Company, 1969,117-118.
  • 7萨拜因.政治学说史[M].北京:商务印书馆,1985,700.
  • 8John E.E.D.Acton,Essays on Freedom and Power,Boston; Beacon Press, 1949,pp.181-195.
  • 9陈永龄.民族辞典[z].上海人民出版社,1987,351.
  • 10[英]克雷伊奇、韦利姆斯库.欧洲的民族和政治国家[M].伦敦.1981.25.

共引文献12

同被引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部