期刊文献+

护理干预对高干病房老年患者焦虑抑郁情绪的影响研究

Effect of Nursing Intervention on the Anxiety and Depression of Elderly Patients in the High Dry Ward
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探究护理干预对高干病房老年患者焦虑、抑郁情绪的影响。方法:选取2017年1月-2018年6月在笔者所在医院高干病房就诊的98例老年患者,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组和试验组,各49例。对照组采用常规护理方法,试验组采用护理干预。比较两组患者焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分及患者的满意度。结果:护理前,两组患者SAS、SDS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,试验组患者SAS评分(36.24±7.24)分,SDS评分(34.54±6.32)分,均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组患者总满意率为97.96%,显著高于对照组的83.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对高干病房老年患者实施护理干预,可有效缓解患者焦虑、抑郁情绪,提升患者满意度,在临床中具有推广应用价值。 Objective:To explore the effect of nursing intervention on anxiety and depression of elderly patients in high-dry wards.Method:A total of 98 elderly patients who were treated in the high-dry ward of our hospital from January 2017 to June 2018 were selected and divided into the control group and the experimental group according to the random number table method,with 49 case in each group.The control group adopted routine nursing methods.The experimental group adopted nursing intervention.The self-rating anxiety scale(SAS),self-rating depression scale(SDS)scores and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Result:Before nursing,there were no statistically significant differences in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups(P>0.05).After nursing,the scores of SAS(36.24±7.24)points and SDS(34.54±6.32)points in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The total satisfaction rate of the experimental group was 97.96%,which was significantly higher than 83.67%of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Nursing interventions for elderly patients in high-dry wards can effectively relieve patients’anxiety and depression and improve patients’satisfaction,which has the value of promotion and application in clinical practice.
作者 刘燕姬 LIU Yanji(Union Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou 350001,China)
出处 《中外医学研究》 2019年第25期82-84,共3页 CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词 高干病房 护理干预 SAS SDS 满意度 High-dry ward Nursing intervention SAS SDS Satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献40

  • 1赵淑华,张丽萍,孟宪瑞.老年病人的心理护理[J].中国疗养医学,2003,12(4):269-270. 被引量:4
  • 2孟繁忠.离退休老干部的心理特点及应对方略[J].中国疗养医学,2003,12(2):114-116. 被引量:7
  • 3潘淑琴,徐波,潘琦.北京市216名护士长的心理卫生状况及其影响因素调查[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(7):662-664. 被引量:24
  • 4LuthansF,Youssef CM,Avolio BJ.心理资本[M].李超平译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2008.
  • 5徐筠.支气管哮喘理论及治疗护理发展近况.中国当代护理杂志,2010,.
  • 6Luthans F, Luthans K W, Luthans B C. Positive psy- chological capital: beyond human and social capital[J].Business Horizons, 2004,47 ( 1 ) : 45-50.
  • 7Snyder C R, Lopez S. Handbook of positive psychology [M]. New York.. Oxford University Press, 2002: 158- 169.
  • 8Luthans K W, Jensen S M. The linkage between psycho- logical capital and commitment to organizational mission: a study of nurses[J].J Nurs Adm,2005,35(6) :304-310.
  • 9Maslach C, Schaufeli W B, Leiter M P. Job burnout[J]. Annu Rev Psychol,2001(52):397-422.
  • 10游兆媛.护士的心理问题对护理不良事件的影响及对策[J].中国误诊举杂志.2011.11(29):7225-7226.

共引文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部