2Karabulut N.Kiroglu Y, Herek D,et al. Feasibility of low-dose unenhanced muhi-detector CT in patients with suspected acute appendicitis: comparison with sonography[J ]. Clin Imaging, 2011,38 ( 3 ) : 296 - 301.
3Flum D R, Morris A, Koepsell "I', et al. Has misdiag- nosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A popula- t ion-based analysis[J ]. J AMA, 2001,286 ( 14 ) : 1748 - 1753.
4Karabulut N, Boyaci N, Yagci B, et al. Computed mmography cvahmtion of the normal appendix: corn- parison of low-dose and standard dose unenhaneed helical computed tomography[J]. J Comput Assist To- mogr,2007,31 (5) :732-740.
5l.ally K P.Cox Jr C S, Andrassy R J,et aI. Sabiston textbook of surgery[M]. New York, NY:Saunders, 200,1: 1381- 1395.
6Keyzer C. Zalcman M, l)eMaertclaer V, et al. Compari- son of US and unenhanced muhi detector row CT in patients suspected of having acute appendicitisLJ]. Ra- diology, 2005. 236 ( 2 ) : 527 - 534.
7Hernanz-Schulman M. CT and US in the diagnosis of appendicitis : an argument for C'F[J]. Radiology, 2010, 225(1):3-7.
8Lai V,Chan W C. l,au H Y.et al. Diagnostic power of va- rious compmerd tomography signs in diagnosing acute ap- pendicitis[J]. Clin Imaging,2012,36(1) :29 34.
