期刊文献+

我国慈善组织财务信息披露问题研究 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 怀有仁爱之心谓之慈,广行济困之举谓之善,慈善是仁德与善行的统一。现阶段,中国社会慈善组织如雨后春笋般发展壮大,已逐步成为社会管理和社会建设的重要力量。但其中不少慈善组织也出现诸多弊病:善款去向不明、业务活动信息和财务信息披露不完整、资金使用效率低下等。笔者通过分析和探讨中西方慈善组织财务信息披露制度,建议提出行之有效的监督管理机制。
出处 《时代金融》 2014年第4X期139-139,共1页 Times Finance
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献3

  • 1[美]詹姆斯.P.盖拉特著,邓国胜等译.21世纪非营利组织管理[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
  • 2慈善捐赠的财税激励政策效应分析.慈善杂志,2008,.
  • 3萨拉蒙.全球公民社会-非营利部门视界[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002,5..

共引文献4

同被引文献21

  • 1李静,万继峰.我国非营利组织会计信息披露现状解读[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2006,26(2):30-33. 被引量:23
  • 2Van Staden, C. and J. Heslop. Implications of applying a private sector based reporting model to not -for - profit entities : the treatment of charita- ble distributions by charities in New Zealand. Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 19, No. I (2009).
  • 3Alpa Dhanani . Accountability of UK charities. Public Money & Management. Vol. 29, Issue 3 (2009).
  • 4Carolyn J. Cordery and Rachel F. Baskerville. Charity financial reporting regulation: a comparative study of the UK and New Zealand. Accounting History. Vol. 12, No. I (2007).
  • 5Hyndman, N. Governance and charities: an exploration of key themes and the development of a research agenda. Financial Accounting& Manage- merit, Vol. 25 ( 2009 ).
  • 6IRS (2007) Form 990 Redesign for Tax Year 2008 Background. Paper. December 20. Available at http ://www. irs. gov/pub/irs - tege/back- ground_paper_form 990 redesign, pdf.
  • 7Weil Gotshal & Manges. Annual reporting requirements and public information regarding non -for -profit organization. The guide to non -for - profit governance ( 2012 ).
  • 8Cordery C J, Baskerville - Morley R F. Charity financial reporting regulation : a comparison of the United Kingdom and her former colony, New Zealand. (2005).
  • 9Irvine H, Ryan C, McGregor - Lowndes M. An International Comparison of Not - For - Profit Accounting Regulation//Proceedings of the 6th Asia - Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting (APIRA) Conference. ( 2010 ).
  • 10Debra Morris. New Charity Regulation Proposals for England and Wales: Overdue or Overdone? . Chicago -kent Law Review. Vol. 80 (2005).

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部