3Barth, M. E. Global financial reporting: Implications for U.S. Academics [ J ] . The Accounting Review, 2008, 83:1159 - 1179.
4Barth, M. E., Beaver, W., and Landsman, W. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: Another view [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2001, 31:77 - 104.
5Becker, G. S. A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence [ J ] . Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983, 98 : 371 -400.
6Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., La Porta, R, Lopez - de - Silanes, F. , and Shleifer, A. The new tompartitive economics [J] Journal of Comparative Economics, 2003, 31:595-619.
7Gonedes, N. , and Dopuch, N. Capital market equilibrium, information production, and selecting accounting techniques: Theoretical framework and review of empirical work [ J ]. Journal of Accounting Research, 1974, 12 (Supplement) : 48 - 129.
8Grossman, G. , and Helpman, E. Special Interest Politics [ M ] Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2001.
9Healy, P. , and Palepu, K. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a review of the empirical disclosure literature [ J ] . Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2001, 31 : 405 -440.
10Holthausen, R., and Watts, R. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting [ J ] . Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2001,31 : 3 -75.
