期刊文献+

论情境主义的挑战与德性品质的稳定性——从描述性理论与规范性理论的视角

下载PDF
导出
摘要 回顾情境主义对德性伦理学、德性品质稳定性的挑战,论证德性伦理学,可以证成德性品质的稳定性。一是综述了学界已有的讨论,并借助内格尔的"理论自主性"重新审视德性伦理学,引申出区分描述理论与规范理论视域下分析德性伦理学的必要性。二是指出不同理论视角下的德性伦理学的不同诉求,并分析描述性与规范性德性伦理学面临的各种挑战。三是论证一种可能的描述性德性伦理学,对德性品质稳定性的完备回应。
作者 韩燕丽
出处 《云南社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期36-41,共6页 Social Sciences in Yunnan
基金 2014年国家留学基金委公派研究生联合培养博士生项目(项目号:201406220003)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Hurka,Thomas.'Virtuous Act, Virtuous Dispositions'. Analysis . 2006
  • 2T.Nagel.'Ethics as an Autonomous Theoretical Subject'. . 1980
  • 3William Flesson.'Toward a Structure-and Process-IntegaratedV iew of Personality:Traits as Density Distributions of States'. Journal of Personality . 2001
  • 4Valerie Tiberius,Moral Psychology.'A Contemporary Introduction'. . 2014
  • 5S.Epstin.'The Stability of Behavior:I.On PrecedictingM ost of People Much of the Time'. Journal of Personality . 1979
  • 6李楠.先天德性论如何应对情境主义的挑战[J].道德与文明,2015(2):136-141. 被引量:4
  • 7John M.Doris.??Persons, Situations, and Virtue Ethics(J). 2002 (4)
  • 8Maria Merritt.??Virtue Ethics and Situationist Personality Psychology(J)Ethical Theory and Moral Practice . 2000 (4)
  • 9Kamtekar R.Situationism and Virtue Ethics on the Content of Our Character. Ethics . 2004
  • 10Colin DeYoung.Toward a Theory of the Big Five. Psychological Inquiry . 2010

二级参考文献22

  • 1徐向东.先验论证与怀疑论[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,42(2):139-148. 被引量:5
  • 2http://news.cntv.cn/special/2011gdzg/shouye/index.shtml.
  • 3Aristotle, Nicomachean Eth its, 1105a31 - bl 2.
  • 4Aristotle, Metephysics, Book V ; Physics, Book II, chapter 8.
  • 5Aritotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book 1, chapter 1 - 6.
  • 6Wilson G. , The Intentionality of Human Action, Stanford, CA. : Stanford University Press, 1989,pp. 169 - 197.
  • 7Mclaughlin B. , Why Rationalization Is Not a Species of Causal Explanation, in Giuseppina D'oro and Constan- tine Sandis, Reasons and Causes: Causalisrn and anti-Causalisrn in the Philosophy of Action, I.ondon: Palgrave McMil- lan, 2013,pp. 108-109.
  • 8Doris J M. , Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior, Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. p. 63.
  • 9Vranas P B M. The Indetermina- cy Paradox; Character Evaluations and Human Psychology. Norms, 2005, 39(1); 1-42.
  • 10Sabini J. , Silver M. , Lack of Character? Situatlonism Critiqued, Ethics, 2005, 115(3).

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部