期刊文献+

黏粒和粉粒的共存对砂土静动力液化影响的试验研究 被引量:15

Experimental study on effect of coexistence of clay and silt on static and dynamic liquefaction of sand
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了研究黏粒、粉粒与砂粒共存的土体中,黏粒和粉粒对砂土抗液化的影响规律,通过静力与动力三轴仪试验系统,对细粒(黏粒和粉粒)含量FC为5%和10%、三种不同细粒配比的试样进行静力与动力三轴试验。试验结果表明:相同细粒含量、不同细粒配比试样的抗液化强度不同;当细粒含量不同时,随着细粒中黏粒或粉粒含量的单调变化,试样所表现出的抗液化规律不同;FC=10%试样的抗液化强度整体高于FC=5%试样的相应强度。随着细粒含量及细粒中黏粒与粉粒相对含量的变化,黏粒与粉粒对砂粒的填充、黏结与骨架作用所占比例不同。 In order to study the influence rules of clay and silt on the liquefaction resistance of sand in the mixture of clay,silt and sand,based on the static and dynamic triaxial tests,the sand specimens with two different fines(clay and silt)contents(FCs),5%and 10%,and three different fines proportions are investigated by the static and dynamic triaxial system.The test results show that the liquefaction resistance of specimens with the same fines content and different fines proportions are different.When the fines content of the specimens is different,the laws of liquefaction resistance are different with the monotonous change of the clay or silt content in the fines.The liquefaction resistance of the specimens with FC of 10%are higher than that of the specimens with FC of 5%.The clay and silt play roles of filling,bonding and skeleton effects on the sand particles.And with the change of clay and silt content in the fines,the proportion of these three roles is different under different fines contents.
作者 李涛 唐小微 LI Tao;TANG Xiao-wei(State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116023,China)
出处 《岩土工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第A02期169-172,共4页 Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(51639002) 国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1505305)
关键词 混合土 细粒含量 细粒配比 黏粒含量 粉粒含量 抗液化强度 mixed soil fines content fines proportion clay content silt content liquefaction resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1GB50021--2001岩土工程勘察规范[S].2001.
  • 2GB50011-2010.建筑抗震设计规范[s].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010..
  • 3SEED R B, CETIN K O, MOSS R E S, et al. Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering, a unified and consistent framework[R]. California: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2003.
  • 4SEED H B, IDRISS I M, ARANGO I. Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1983, 109(3): 458 - 482.
  • 5SEED H B, TOKIMATSU K, HARDER L F, et al. The influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(12): 1425 - 1445.
  • 6谢君斐.关于修改抗震规范砂上液化判别式的几点意见[J].地震工程与工程振动,1984,4(2):95-126.
  • 7HWANG J H, YANG C W. Verification of critical cyclic strength curve by Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake data[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2001, 21:237 - 257.
  • 8YOUD T L, IDRISS I M. Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[J]..Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironment Engineering, 2001, 127(4): 297 - 313.
  • 9喻萍,袁苏跃,王海莹.昆明地区粉、砂土液化判别存在问题的讨论[J].昆明理工大学学报(理工版),2004,29(2):99-102. 被引量:3

共引文献11

同被引文献136

引证文献15

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部